ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2013
Development of a D-xylose fermenting and inhibitor tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with high performance in lignocellulose hydrolysates using metabolic and evolutionary engineering.
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 335 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response mechanisms of xylitol-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains to acetic acid and furfural and the role of SPI1, CTT1, and CLB1 in tolerance.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Microbial Bioprocessing of Food and Agro-Industrial Residues for a Sustainable Circular Economy.Indian journal of microbiology · 2025Review
- Physiology and Robustness of Yeasts Exposed to Dynamic pH and Glucose Environments.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2025Article
- Engineering Saccharomyces Cerevisiae With Novel Functional Xylose Isomerases From Rumen Microbiota for Enhanced Biofuel Production.Biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Glucose receptor deletion and engineering: impact on xylose sensing and utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.FEMS yeast research · 2025Article
- Engineering transcriptional regulatory networks for improving second-generation fuel ethanol production inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Review
- Metabolic Engineering and Process Intensification for Muconic Acid Production UsingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Development of a RobustMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- A Multiomics Perspective on Plant Cell Wall-Degrading Enzyme Production: Insights from the Unexploited FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Enhancing xylose-fermentation capacity of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by multistep evolutionary engineering in inhibitor-rich lignocellulose hydrolysate.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- Construction of an economical xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its ethanol fermentation.FEMS yeast research · 2024Article
- Review
- Genomic and metabolic instability during long-term fermentation of an industrialFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Performance and robustness analysis reveals phenotypic trade-offs in yeast.Life science alliance · 2024Article
- Four ways of implementing robustness quantification in strain characterisation.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- Impact of xylose epimerase on sugar assimilation and sensing in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae carrying different xylose-utilization pathways.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- FromJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Engineering the Metabolic Landscape of Microorganisms for Lignocellulosic Conversion.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Large scale microfluidic CRISPR screening for increased amylase secretion in yeast.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe production of bioethanol from lignocellulose hydrolysates requires a robust, D-xylose-fermenting and inhibitor-tolerant microorganism as catalyst. The purpose of the present work was to develop such a strain from a prime industrial yeast strain, Ethanol Red, used for bioethanol production.
resultsAn expression cassette containing 13 genes including Clostridium phytofermentans XylA, encoding D-xylose isomerase (XI), and enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway was inserted in two copies in the genome of Ethanol Red. Subsequent EMS mutagenesis, genome shuffling and selection in D-xylose-enriched lignocellulose hydrolysate, followed by multiple rounds of evolutionary engineering in complex medium with D-xylose, gradually established efficient D-xylose fermentation. The best-performing strain, GS1.11-26, showed a maximum specific D-xylose consumption rate of 1.1 g/g DW/h in synthetic medium, with complete attenuation of 35 g/L D-xylose in about 17 h. In separate hydrolysis and fermentation of lignocellulose hydrolysates of Arundo donax (giant reed), spruce and a wheat straw/hay mixture, the maximum specific D-xylose consumption rate was 0.36, 0.23 and 1.1 g/g DW inoculum/h, and the final ethanol titer was 4.2, 3.9 and 5.8% (v/v), respectively. In simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of Arundo hydrolysate, GS1.11-26 produced 32% more ethanol than the parent strain Ethanol Red, due to efficient D-xylose utilization. The high D-xylose fermentation capacity was stable after extended growth in glucose. Cell extracts of strain GS1.11-26 displayed 17-fold higher XI activity compared to the parent strain, but overexpression of XI alone was not enough to establish D-xylose fermentation. The high D-xylose consumption rate was due to synergistic interaction between the high XI activity and one or more mutations in the genome. The GS1.11-26 had a partial respiratory defect causing a reduced aerobic growth rate.
conclusionsAn industrial yeast strain for bioethanol production with lignocellulose hydrolysates has been developed in the genetic background of a strain widely used for commercial bioethanol production. The strain uses glucose and D-xylose with high consumption rates and partial cofermentation in various lignocellulose hydrolysates with very high ethanol yield. The GS1.11-26 strain shows highly promising potential for further development of an all-round robust yeast strain for efficient fermentation of various lignocellulose hydrolysates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.