Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23800085›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2013

Separating homeologs by phasing in the tetraploid wheat transcriptome.

Ksenia V Krasileva, Vince Buffalo, Paul Bailey, Stephen Pearce, Sarah Ayling, Facundo Tabbita, Marcelo Soria, Shichen Wang, IWGS Consortium, Eduard Akhunov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The FKF1-ELF3-PRC2 module regulates flowering time in response to light in temperate grasses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Relationship between the Phenylpropanoid Pathway and Dwarfism ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Multi-Omics Analysis of Small RNA, Transcriptome, and Degradome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ksenia V Krasileva
Vince Buffalo
Paul Bailey
Stephen Pearce
Sarah Ayling
Facundo Tabbita
Marcelo Soria
Shichen Wang
IWGS Consortium
Eduard Akhunov
Cristobal Uauy
Jorge Dubcovsky
University of California, Davis · USNorwich Research Park · GBKansas State University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000712/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J003557/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0628Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe high level of identity among duplicated homoeologous genomes in tetraploid pasta wheat presents substantial challenges for de novo transcriptome assembly. To solve this problem, we develop a specialized bioinformatics workflow that optimizes transcriptome assembly and separation of merged homoeologs. To evaluate our strategy, we sequence and assemble the transcriptome of one of the diploid ancestors of pasta wheat, and compare both assemblies with a benchmark set of 13,472 full-length, non-redundant bread wheat cDNAs.

resultsA total of 489 million 100 bp paired-end reads from tetraploid wheat assemble in 140,118 contigs, including 96% of the benchmark cDNAs. We used a comparative genomics approach to annotate 66,633 open reading frames. The multiple k-mer assembly strategy increases the proportion of cDNAs assembled full-length in a single contig by 22% relative to the best single k-mer size. Homoeologs are separated using a post-assembly pipeline that includes polymorphism identification, phasing of SNPs, read sorting, and re-assembly of phased reads. Using a reference set of genes, we determine that 98.7% of SNPs analyzed are correctly separated by phasing.

conclusionsOur study shows that de novo transcriptome assembly of tetraploid wheat benefit from multiple k-mer assembly strategies more than diploid wheat. Our results also demonstrate that phasing approaches originally designed for heterozygous diploid organisms can be used to separate the close homoeologous genomes of tetraploid wheat. The predicted tetraploid wheat proteome and gene models provide a valuable tool for the wheat research community and for those interested in comparative genomic studies.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantGenome, PlantTranscriptomeBase SequenceChromosomes, PlantContig MappingGenetic MarkersModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePseudogenesTetraploidyTriticumGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID23800085
PMCPMC4053977
OpenAlexW2118889089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.