Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799999›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2013

Surveillance on A/H5N1 virus in domestic poultry and wild birds in Egypt.

Elham F El-Zoghby, Mona M Aly, Soad A Nasef, Mohamed K Hassan, Abdel-Satar Arafa, Abdullah A Selim, Shereen G Kholousy, Walid H Kilany, Marwa Safwat, E M Abdelwhab and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Avian Influenza: Strategies to Manage an Outbreak.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. H5 Influenza Viruses in Egypt.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Avian influenza.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Predicting Avian Influenza Co-Infection with H5N1 and H9N2 in Northern Egypt.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elham F El-ZoghbyNational Laboratory for Veterinary Quality Control on Poultry Production, Animal Health Research Institute, Dokki, PO Box 246, Giza 12618, Egypt.
Mona M Aly
Soad A Nasef
Mohamed K Hassan
Abdel-Satar Arafa
Abdullah A Selim
Shereen G Kholousy
Walid H Kilany
Marwa Safwat
E M Abdelwhab
Hafez M Hafez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endemic H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus (A/H5N1) in poultry in Egypt continues to cause heavy losses in poultry and poses a significant threat to human health.

methodsHere we describe results of A/H5N1 surveillance in domestic poultry in 2009 and wild birds in 2009-2010. Tracheal and cloacal swabs were collected from domestic poultry from 22024 commercial farms, 1435 backyards and 944 live bird markets (LBMs) as well as from 1297 wild birds representing 28 different types of migratory birds. Viral RNA was extracted from a mix of tracheal and cloacal swabs media. Matrix gene of avian influenza type A virus was detected using specific real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and positive samples were tested by RT-qPCR for simultaneous detection of the H5 and N1 genes.

resultsIn this surveillance, A/H5N1 was detected from 0.1% (n = 23/) of examined commercial poultry farms, 10.5% (n = 151) of backyard birds and 11.4% (n = 108) of LBMs but no wild bird tested positive for A/H5N1. The virus was detected from domestic poultry year-round with higher incidence in the warmer months of summer and spring particularly in backyard birds. Outbreaks were recorded mostly in Lower Egypt where 95.7% (n = 22), 68.9% (n = 104) and 52.8% (n = 57) of positive commercial farms, backyards and LBMs were detected, respectively. Higher prevalence (56%, n = 85) was reported in backyards that had mixed chickens and waterfowl together in the same vicinity and LBMs that had waterfowl (76%, n = 82).

conclusionOur findings indicated broad circulation of the endemic A/H5N1 among poultry in 2009 in Egypt. In addition, the epidemiology of A/H5N1 has changed over time with outbreaks occurring in the warmer months of the year. Backyard waterfowl may play a role as a reservoir and/or source of A/H5N1 particularly in LBMs. The virus has been established in poultry in the Nile Delta where major metropolitan areas, dense human population and poultry stocks are concentrated. Continuous surveillance, tracing the source of live birds in the markets and integration of multifaceted strategies and global collaboration are needed to control the spread of the virus in Egypt.

Indexed as

AnimalsBirdsCloacaDisease OutbreaksEgyptHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsNeuraminidasePoultryPrevalenceReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSeasonsTracheaViral Matrix ProteinsViral Proteinshemagglutinin, avian influenza A virusHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusM1 protein, Influenza A virusNA protein, influenza A virusNeuraminidaseViral Matrix ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23799999
PMCPMC3699397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.