Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799984›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine (London, England)2014

Heterogeneity in nanoparticles influences biodistribution and targeting.

Isaac M Adjei, Chiranjeevi Peetla, Vinod Labhasetwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nanotherapeutic Heterogeneity: Sources, Effects, and Solutions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  4. Catalytic antioxidant nanoparticles mitigate secondary injury progression and promote functional recovery in spinal cord injury model.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Sex-based differences of antioxidant enzyme nanoparticle effects following traumatic brain injury.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Inhibition of bone loss with surface-modulated, drug-loaded nanoparticles in an intraosseous model of prostate cancer.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2016
    Article
  14. Control of polymeric nanoparticle size to improve therapeutic delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isaac M AdjeiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Chiranjeevi Peetla
Vinod Labhasetwar

Funding

Drug Resistance In Cancer TherapyR01CA149359 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Nuclear-targeted nanoparticles for gene deliveryR01EB003975 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LABHASETWAR, VINOD D · 2005 to 2008
$1.1M
Role of Physical Properties in Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution and Tumor UptakeF31CA150566 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI ADJEI, ISAAC MORRIS · 2010 to 2012
$105k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS 1R01CA149359NCI NIH HHS 5F31CA150566NCI NIH HHS F31 CA150566NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149359NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB003975NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA large fraction of the administered dose of nanoparticles (NPs) localizes into nontarget tissue, which could be due to the heterogeneous population of NPs. MATERIALS &

methodsTo investigate the impact of the above issue, we simultaneously tracked the biodistribution using optical imaging of two different sized poly(d,l-lactide co-glycolide) NPs, which also varied in their surface charge and texture, in a prostate tumor xenograft mouse model.

resultsAlthough formulated using the same polymer and emulsifier concentration, small NPs were neutral (S-neutral-NPs), whereas large NPs were anionic (L-anionic-NPs). Simultaneous injection of these NPs, representing heterogeneity, shows significantly different biodistribution. S-neutral-NPs demonstrated longer circulation time than L-anionic-NPs (t1/2 = 96 vs 13 min); accounted for 75% of total NPs accumulated in the tumor; and showed 13-fold greater tumor to liver signal intensity ratio than L-anionic-NPs.

conclusionThe data underscore the importance of formulating nanocarriers of specific properties to enhance their targeting efficacy.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsHeterograftsMaleMiceProstatic NeoplasmsSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredTissue Distribution

Identifiers

PMID23799984
PMCPMC3883796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.