Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799893›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2013

Long-term treatment of somatostatin analog-refractory growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors with pegvisomant alone or combined with long-acting somatostatin analogs: a retrospective analysis of clinical practice and outcomes.

Antonio Bianchi, Ferdinando Valentini, Raffaella Iuorio, Maurizio Poggi, Roberto Baldelli, Marina Passeri, Antonella Giampietro, Linda Tartaglione, Sabrina Chiloiro, Marialuisa Appetecchia and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can acromegaly be controlled in all cases?Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio BianchiDepartment of Endocrinology, Catholic University, School of Medicine, Largo A, Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. abianchi69@yahoo.it
Ferdinando Valentini
Raffaella Iuorio
Maurizio Poggi
Roberto Baldelli
Marina Passeri
Antonella Giampietro
Linda Tartaglione
Sabrina Chiloiro
Marialuisa Appetecchia
Patrizia Gargiulo
Andrea Fabbri
Vincenzo Toscano
Alfredo Pontecorvi
Laura De Marinis
Catholic University of America · USSapienza University of Rome · ITIstituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPegvisomant (PEGV) is widely used, alone or with somatostatin analogs (SSA), for GH-secreting pituitary tumors poorly controlled by SSAs alone. No information is available on specific indications for or relative efficacies of PEGV+SSA versus PEGV monotherapy. Aim of our study was to characterize real-life clinical use of PEGV vs. PEGV+SSA for SSA-resistant acromegaly (patient selection, long-term outcomes, adverse event rates, doses required to achieve control).

methodsA retrospective analysis of data collected in 2005-2010 in five hospital-based endocrinology centers in Rome was performed. Sixty-two adult acromegaly patients treated ≥6 months with PEGV (Group 1, n=35) or PEGV+SSA (Group 2, n=27) after unsuccessful maximal-dose SSA monotherapy (≥12 months) were enroled. Groups were compared in terms of clinical/biochemical characteristics at diagnosis and before PEGV or PEGV+SSA was started (baseline) and end-of-follow-up outcomes (IGF-I levels, adverse event rates, final PEGV doses).

resultsGroup 2 showed higher IGF-I and GH levels and sleep apnea rates, higher rates residual tumor tissue at baseline, more substantial responses to SSA monotherapy and worse outcomes (IGF-I normalization rates, final IGF-I levels). Tumor growth and hepatotoxicity events were rare in both groups. Final daily PEGV doses were similar and significantly increased with treatment duration in both groups.

conclusionsPEGV and PEGV+SSA are safe, effective solutions for managing SSA-refractory acromegaly. PEGV+SSA tends to be used for more aggressive disease associated with detectable tumor tissue. With both regimens, ongoing monitoring of responses is important since PEGV doses needed to maintain IGF-I control are likely to increase over time.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalFemaleGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHuman Growth HormoneHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSomatostatinTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalHuman Growth HormonepegvisomantSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID23799893
PMCPMC3695848
OpenAlexW2129038842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.