ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013
miR-320c regulates gemcitabine-resistance in pancreatic cancer via SMARCC1.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crosstalk between KRAS and miRNAs in pancreatic cancer: Opportunities for its diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic intervention (Review).International journal of oncology · 2026Review
- <p>Circ72309 modulates gemcitabine metabolism and gemcitabine sensitivity in pancreatic cancer: Serum Circ72309 levels as a potential predictor of treatment response</p>.International journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Expression of microRNAs in the detection and therapeutic roles of viral infections: Mechanisms and applications.Journal of virus eradication · 2025Review
- miR-6855-5p Enhances Radioresistance and Promotes Migration of Pancreatic Cancer by Inducing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition via Suppressing FOXA1: Potential of Plasma Exosomal miR-6855-5p as an Indicator of Radiosensitivity in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Current development of molecular classifications of gastric cancer based on omics (Review).International journal of oncology · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- Skeletal Muscle-Derived Irisin Enhances Gemcitabine Sensitivity and Suppresses Migration Ability in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- MicroRNA-26a-5p is a reliable biomarker in the adjuvant setting for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2024Article
- Anti-tumor effect of avadomide in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023Article
- Mutual Regulation of ncRNAs and Chromatin Remodeling Complexes in Normal and Pathological Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Rubicon can predict prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Noncoding RNAs: an emerging modulator of drug resistance in pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Role of Nanotechnology in Overcoming the Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Therapy: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Clinicopathological significance of MYL9 expression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- EV-miRome-wide profiling uncovers miR-320c for detecting metastatic colorectal cancer and monitoring the therapeutic response.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Inhibition of Clusterin Represses Proliferation by Inducing Cellular Senescence in Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Tumor-targeted miRNA nanomedicine for overcoming challenges in immunity and therapeutic resistance.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2022Review
- Resistance to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Physiopathologic and Pharmacologic Review.Cancers · 2022Review
- ACAT-1-Regulated Cholesteryl Ester Accumulation Modulates Gemcitabine Resistance in Biliary Tract Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGemcitabine-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for pancreatic cancer. However, the issue of resistance remains unresolved. The aim of this study was to identify microRNAs (miRNAs) that govern the resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer.
methodsmiRNA microarray analysis using gemcitabine-resistant clones of MiaPaCa2 (MiaPaCa2-RGs), PSN1 (PSN1-RGs), and their parental cells (MiaPaCa2-P, PSN1-P) was conducted. Changes in the anti-cancer effects of gemcitabine were studied after gain/loss-of-function analysis of the candidate miRNA. Further assessment of the putative target gene was performed in vitro and in 66 pancreatic cancer clinical samples.
resultsmiR-320c expression was significantly higher in MiaPaCa2-RGs and PSN1-RGs than in their parental cells. miR-320c induced resistance to gemcitabine in MiaPaCa2. Further experiments showed that miR-320c-related resistance to gemcitabine was mediated through SMARCC1, a core subunit of the switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. In addition, clinical examination revealed that only SMARCC1-positive patients benefited from gemcitabine therapy with regard to survival after recurrence (P=0.0463).
conclusionThe results indicate that miR-320c regulates the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to gemcitabine through SMARCC1, suggesting that miR-320c/SMARCC1 could be suitable for prediction of the clinical response and potential therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer patients on gemcitabine-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.