Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799701›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health2013

Views, barriers, and suggestions for colorectal cancer screening among american Indian women older than 50 years in the midwest.

Melissa K Filippi, Aimee S James, Sarah Brokenleg, Myrietta Talawyma, David G Perdue, Won S Choi, K Allen Greiner, Christine M Daley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Health Literacy, Health Numeracy, and Cancer Screening Patterns in the Zuni Pueblo: Insights from and Limitations of "Standard" Questions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Contrasts in Practices and Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Nurses and Physicians Working in Primary Care Settings in Oman.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa K FilippiDepartment of Family Medicine, Center for American Indian Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA. mfilippi@kumc.edu
Aimee S James
Sarah Brokenleg
Myrietta Talawyma
David G Perdue
Won S Choi
K Allen Greiner
Christine M Daley
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Sioux Falls · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Project 2P20MD004805 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DALEY, CHRISTINE MAKOSKY, GREINER, K ALLEN · 2010 to 2014
$7.6M
Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in American Indians/Alaska NativesR03CA121828 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI DALEY, CHRISTINE MAKOSKY · 2006 to 2007
$145k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA121828NCI NIH HHS R03CA121828NIMHD NIH HHS L60 MD001231NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD004805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates in the US population have shown a decline, American Indian (AI) CRC mortality rates appear to be increasing. CRC screening rates of AIs remain low when compared with other ethnic groups. The research team explored women's perceptions toward CRC screening, existing barriers, and suggestions to promote education and screening among AI women in Kansas and Missouri.

methodsUsing a community-based participatory research approach, the authors conducted 7 focus groups with AI women older than 50 years (N = 52) to better understand their perceptions of and attitudes toward CRC screening.

resultsWomen recognized barriers to screening, such as embarrassment, privacy issues, fear, insurance, and cost. They countered perceived barriers through inventive suggestions for education and awareness via social support systems and intergenerational relationships. DISCUSSION: CRC screening interventions for AI must be culturally tailored.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIndians, North AmericanInsurance, HealthKansasMarital StatusMiddle AgedMissouriPatient Acceptance of Health CareAmerican Indiancolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningcommunity-based participatory research

Identifiers

PMID23799701
PMCPMC3695416
OpenAlexW2110309026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.