Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799148›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Treating cattle to protect people? Impact of footbath insecticide treatment on tsetse density in Chad.

Noël Ndeledje, Jérémy Bouyer, Frédéric Stachurski, Patrice Grimaud, Adrien Marie Gaston Belem, Fidèle Molélé Mbaïndingatoloum, Zakaria Bengaly, Idriss Oumar Alfaroukh, Guiliano Cecchi, Renaud Lancelot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Veterinary endectocides for malaria control and elimination: prospects and challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating one health: Are we demonstrating effectiveness?One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Noël NdeledjeInstitut Universitaire des Sciences et Techniques d'Abéché (IUSTA), Abéché, Tchad.
Jérémy Bouyer
Frédéric Stachurski
Patrice Grimaud
Adrien Marie Gaston Belem
Fidèle Molélé Mbaïndingatoloum
Zakaria Bengaly
Idriss Oumar Alfaroukh
Guiliano Cecchi
Renaud Lancelot
Centre international de recherche-développement sur l'elevage en zone subhumide · BFCentre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITInstitut Agro Montpellier · FRInstitut National Supérieur des Sciences et Techniques d'Abéché · TDInstitut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles · SNNazi Boni University · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Chad, several species of tsetse flies (Genus: Glossina) transmit African animal trypanosomoses (AAT), which represents a major obstacle to cattle rearing, and sleeping sickness, which impacts public health. After the failure of past interventions to eradicate tsetse, the government of Chad is now looking for other approaches that integrate cost-effective intervention techniques, which can be applied by the stake holders to control tsetse-transmitted trypanosomoses in a sustainable manner. The present study thus attempted to assess the efficacy of restricted application of insecticides to cattle leg extremities using footbaths for controlling Glossina m. submorsitans, G. tachinoides and G. f. fuscipes in southern Chad. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTwo sites were included, one close to the historical human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) focus of Moundou and the other to the active foci of Bodo and Moissala. At both sites, a treated and an untreated herd were compared. In the treatment sites, cattle were treated on a regular basis using a formulation of deltamethrin 0.005% (67 to 98 cattle were treated in one of the sites and 88 to 102 in the other one). For each herd, tsetse densities were monthly monitored using 7 biconical traps set along the river and beside the cattle pen from February to December 2009. The impact of footbath treatment on tsetse populations was strong (p < 10(-3)) with a reduction of 80% in total tsetse catches by the end of the 6-month footbath treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The impact of footbath treatment as a vector control tool within an integrated strategy to manage AAT and HAT is discussed in the framework of the "One Health" concept. Like other techniques based on the treatment of cattle, this technology should be used under controlled conditions, in order to avoid the development of insecticide and acaricide resistance in tsetse and tick populations, respectively.

Indexed as

AnimalsBathsCattleChadHumansInsect ControlInsecticidesInsect VectorsNitrilesPopulation DynamicsPrevalencePyrethrinsSeroepidemiologic StudiesTrypanosoma vivaxTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTrypanosomiasis, BovinedecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID23799148
PMCPMC3682971
OpenAlexW2013978675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.