ArticlePloS one2013
Treating cattle to protect people? Impact of footbath insecticide treatment on tsetse density in Chad.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Updating the northern tsetse distribution limit in Chad in the context of global change].Medecine tropicale et sante internationale · 2024Article
- Acaricidal Potential and Ecotoxicity of Metallic Nano-Pesticides Used against the Major Life Stages ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Diversity of trypanosomes in humans and cattle in the HAT foci Mandoul and Maro, Southern Chad-A matter of concern for zoonotic potential?PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Novel control strategies for mosquito-borne diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Veterinary endectocides for malaria control and elimination: prospects and challenges.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Repurposing the orphan drug nitisinone to control the transmission of African trypanosomiasis.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Delivering 'tiny targets' in a remote region of southern Chad: a cost analysis of tsetse control in the Mandoul sleeping sickness focus.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- Article
- Evaluating one health: Are we demonstrating effectiveness?One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Review
- Insecticide and Repellent Mixture Pour-On Protects Cattle against Animal Trypanosomosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- Neemazal ® as a possible alternative control tool for malaria and African trypanosomiasis?Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- Experiences in Tick Control by Acaricide in the Traditional Cattle Sector in Zambia and Burkina Faso: Possible Environmental and Public Health Implications.Frontiers in public health · 2016Review
- Tsetse Flies (Glossina) as Vectors of Human African Trypanosomiasis: A Review.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Developing a continental atlas of the distribution and trypanosomal infection of tsetse flies (Glossina species).Parasites & vectors · 2015Article
- Pyrethroid treatment of cattle for tsetse control: reducing its impact on dung fauna.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2015Article
- Integrated fly management in European ruminant operations from the perspective of directive 2009/128/EC on sustainable use of pesticides.Parasitology research · 2015Review
- Acaricidal efficacy of a new combination of fipronil and permethrin against Ixodes ricinus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks.Parasites & vectors · 2015Article
- Emerging and reemerging neglected tropical diseases: a review of key characteristics, risk factors, and the policy and innovation environment.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Chad, several species of tsetse flies (Genus: Glossina) transmit African animal trypanosomoses (AAT), which represents a major obstacle to cattle rearing, and sleeping sickness, which impacts public health. After the failure of past interventions to eradicate tsetse, the government of Chad is now looking for other approaches that integrate cost-effective intervention techniques, which can be applied by the stake holders to control tsetse-transmitted trypanosomoses in a sustainable manner. The present study thus attempted to assess the efficacy of restricted application of insecticides to cattle leg extremities using footbaths for controlling Glossina m. submorsitans, G. tachinoides and G. f. fuscipes in southern Chad. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsTwo sites were included, one close to the historical human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) focus of Moundou and the other to the active foci of Bodo and Moissala. At both sites, a treated and an untreated herd were compared. In the treatment sites, cattle were treated on a regular basis using a formulation of deltamethrin 0.005% (67 to 98 cattle were treated in one of the sites and 88 to 102 in the other one). For each herd, tsetse densities were monthly monitored using 7 biconical traps set along the river and beside the cattle pen from February to December 2009. The impact of footbath treatment on tsetse populations was strong (p < 10(-3)) with a reduction of 80% in total tsetse catches by the end of the 6-month footbath treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The impact of footbath treatment as a vector control tool within an integrated strategy to manage AAT and HAT is discussed in the framework of the "One Health" concept. Like other techniques based on the treatment of cattle, this technology should be used under controlled conditions, in order to avoid the development of insecticide and acaricide resistance in tsetse and tick populations, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.