Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23799087›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Cancer missense mutations alter binding properties of proteins and their interaction networks.

Hafumi Nishi, Manoj Tyagi, Shaolei Teng, Benjamin A Shoemaker, Kosuke Hashimoto, Emil Alexov, Stefan Wuchty, Anna R Panchenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer driver mutations: predictions and reality.Trends in molecular medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Analyses of Mutation Displacements from Homology Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Computed cancer interactome explains the effects of somatic mutations in cancers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hafumi NishiNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Manoj Tyagi
Shaolei Teng
Benjamin A Shoemaker
Kosuke Hashimoto
Emil Alexov
Stefan Wuchty
Anna R Panchenko
National Institutes of Health · USClemson University · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · USRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Protein-protein binding: regulation and effect of disease mutationsZIALM090313 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PANCHENKO, ANNA · 2013 to 2018
$5.2M
New Generation DelPhi: large systems and beyond electrostaticsR01GM093937 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXOV, EMIL GEORGIEV · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093937NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM093937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have shown that missense mutations might play an important role in carcinogenesis. However, the extent to which cancer mutations might affect biomolecular interactions remains unclear. Here, we map glioblastoma missense mutations on the human protein interactome, model the structures of affected protein complexes and decipher the effect of mutations on protein-protein, protein-nucleic acid and protein-ion binding interfaces. Although some missense mutations over-stabilize protein complexes, we found that the overall effect of mutations is destabilizing, mostly affecting the electrostatic component of binding energy. We also showed that mutations on interfaces resulted in more drastic changes of amino acid physico-chemical properties than mutations occurring outside the interfaces. Analysis of glioblastoma mutations on interfaces allowed us to stratify cancer-related interactions, identify potential driver genes, and propose two dozen additional cancer biomarkers, including those specific to functions of the nervous system. Such an analysis also offered insight into the molecular mechanism of the phenotypic outcomes of mutations, including effects on complex stability, activity, binding and turnover rate. As a result of mutated protein and gene network analysis, we observed that interactions of proteins with mutations mapped on interfaces had higher bottleneck properties compared to interactions with mutations elsewhere on the protein or unaffected interactions. Such observations suggest that genes with mutations directly affecting protein binding properties are preferably located in central network positions and may influence critical nodes and edges in signal transduction networks.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseArtificial IntelligenceBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsGlioblastomaHumansModels, BiologicalPhenotypeProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MapsProtein StabilityThermodynamicsDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23799087
PMCPMC3682950
OpenAlexW2079317986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.