Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23798727›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2013

Imaging cell biology in live animals: ready for prime time.

Roberto Weigert, Natalie Porat-Shliom, Panomwat Amornphimoltham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perfusion Window Chambers Enable Interventional Analyses of Tumor Microenvironments.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Method for Acute Intravital Imaging of the Large Intestine in Live Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  17. DNA/RNA Fluorescence Imaging by Synthetic Nucleic Acids.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Actually Seeing What Is Going on - Intravital Microscopy in Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roberto WeigertOral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. weigertr@mail.nih.gov
Natalie Porat-Shliom
Panomwat Amornphimoltham

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms regulating membrane trafficking in salivary glandsZIADE000717 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI WEIGERT, ROBERTO · 2009 to 2015
$9.2M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-lapse fluorescence microscopy is one of the main tools used to image subcellular structures in living cells. Yet for decades it has been applied primarily to in vitro model systems. Thanks to the most recent advancements in intravital microscopy, this approach has finally been extended to live rodents. This represents a major breakthrough that will provide unprecedented new opportunities to study mammalian cell biology in vivo and has already provided new insight in the fields of neurobiology, immunology, and cancer biology.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell BiologyCells, CulturedCytological TechniquesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceTime-Lapse ImagingGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23798727
PMCPMC3691462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.