Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23798534›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2013

Staphopains modulate Staphylococcus aureus biofilm integrity.

Joe M Mootz, Cheryl L Malone, Lindsey N Shaw, Alexander R Horswill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevention and Treatment ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The secreted proteasesVirulence · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The major role ofVirulence · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ficin-Cyclodextrin-Based Docking Nanoarchitectonics of Self-Propelled Nanomotors for Bacterial Biofilm Eradication.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joe M MootzDepartment of Microbiology, Roy J and Lucille A Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Cheryl L Malone
Lindsey N Shaw
Alexander R Horswill
University of Iowa · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MECHANISMS OF PARASITISMT32AI007511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUTLER, NOAH SULLIVAN, WEBER, MARY · 1996 to 2025
$8.1M
Quorum sensing-dependent interactions with biofilms and innate immunity defensesR01AI078921 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HORSWILL, ALEXANDER R · 2008 to 2012
$2.0M
The Role of Extracellular Proteases in CA-MRSA InfectionsR21AI090350 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI SHAW, LINDSEY NEIL · 2010 to 2011
$402k
NIAID NIH HHS AI078921NIAID NIH HHS AI090350NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI078921NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI090350NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007511NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI07511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a known cause of chronic biofilm infections that can reside on medical implants or host tissue. Recent studies have demonstrated an important role for proteinaceous material in the biofilm structure. The S. aureus genome encodes many secreted proteases, and there is growing evidence that these enzymes have self-cleavage properties that alter biofilm integrity. However, the specific contribution of each protease and mechanism of biofilm modulation is not clear. To address this issue, we utilized a sigma factor B (ΔsigB) mutant where protease activity results in a biofilm-negative phenotype, thereby creating a condition where the protease(s) responsible for the phenotype could be identified. Using a plasma-coated microtiter assay, biofilm formation was restored to the ΔsigB mutant through the addition of the cysteine protease inhibitor E-64 or by using Staphostatin inhibitors that specifically target the extracellular cysteine proteases SspB and ScpA (called Staphopains). Through construction of gene deletion mutants, we determined that an sspB scpA double mutant restored ΔsigB biofilm formation, and this recovery could be replicated in plasma-coated flow cell biofilms. Staphopain levels were also found to be decreased under biofilm-forming conditions, possibly allowing biofilm establishment. The treatment of S. aureus biofilms with purified SspB or ScpA enzyme inhibited their formation, and ScpA was also able to disperse an established biofilm. The antibiofilm properties of ScpA were conserved across S. aureus strain lineages. These findings suggest an underappreciated role of the SspB and ScpA cysteine proteases in modulating S. aureus biofilm architecture.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiofilmsCysteine EndopeptidasesCysteine ProteasesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsCysteine EndopeptidasesCysteine Proteases

Identifiers

PMID23798534
PMCPMC3754231
OpenAlexW2166739245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.