Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23797813›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: long-term survival and prognostic factors.

Xinguo Xiong, Wenlong Shao, Weiqiang Yin, Xin Xu, Hanzhang Chen, Yuan Qiu, Jianxing He

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinguo Xiong
Wenlong Shao
Weiqiang Yin
Xin Xu
Hanzhang Chen
Yuan Qiu
Jianxing He

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major pulmonary resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of the 411 stage I patients, 318 (77.4 %) underwent complete VATS (c-VATS), while 89 (21.7 %) underwent assisted VATS (a-VATS). There were no intraoperative deaths. There were three deaths (0.7 %) within 30 postoperative days. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.1 % (95 % CI, 92.9–97.3 %), 83.1 % (95 % CI, 79.2–87.0 %), and 73.4 % (95 % CI, 68.1–78.7 %), respectively. Univariate analysis by log-rank test revealed that tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, primary tumor (pT) status, and type of resection were statistically significant factors affecting overall survival (OS; P = 0.029, P = 0.025, and P = 0.005, respectively). Less acute TNM stage and less extensive resection were significantly predictive for longer OS by multivariate analysis as well (P = 0.024 and P = 0.006, respectively). In experienced hands, c-VATS or a-VATS can be considered as an alternative to traditional incision in patients with stage I NSCLC. Lower TNM stage and less extensive resection were significantly predictive for better OS. A prospective randomized controlled study on a larger scale is required to reach definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of VATS relative to other techniques.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial FibrillationCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.