ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2013
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: long-term survival and prognostic factors.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prognostic impact of CD8 and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.British journal of cancer · 2019Article
- Management and postoperative outcome in primary lung cancer and heart disease co-morbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Article
- Research, evidence, and ethics: new technology or grey medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2015Article
- Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma conforming to the Milan criteria: systemic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Article
- Analysis of feasibility and safety of complete video-assisted thoracoscopic resection of anatomic pulmonary segments under non-intubated anesthesia.Journal of thoracic disease · 2014Article
- Chinese multi-institutional registry (CMIR) for resected non-small cell lung cancer: survival analysis of 5,853 cases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) major pulmonary resection in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of the 411 stage I patients, 318 (77.4 %) underwent complete VATS (c-VATS), while 89 (21.7 %) underwent assisted VATS (a-VATS). There were no intraoperative deaths. There were three deaths (0.7 %) within 30 postoperative days. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.1 % (95 % CI, 92.9–97.3 %), 83.1 % (95 % CI, 79.2–87.0 %), and 73.4 % (95 % CI, 68.1–78.7 %), respectively. Univariate analysis by log-rank test revealed that tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, primary tumor (pT) status, and type of resection were statistically significant factors affecting overall survival (OS; P = 0.029, P = 0.025, and P = 0.005, respectively). Less acute TNM stage and less extensive resection were significantly predictive for longer OS by multivariate analysis as well (P = 0.024 and P = 0.006, respectively). In experienced hands, c-VATS or a-VATS can be considered as an alternative to traditional incision in patients with stage I NSCLC. Lower TNM stage and less extensive resection were significantly predictive for better OS. A prospective randomized controlled study on a larger scale is required to reach definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of VATS relative to other techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23797813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.