Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23797685›Full record

ReviewPurinergic signalling2013

Purinergic signalling and cancer.

Geoffrey Burnstock, Francesco Di Virgilio

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Purinergic signalling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. AC3Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ATP-Powered Signaling Between Artificial and Living Cells.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Possible Roles for Purinergic Receptor P2RX4 in Breast and Prostate Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Geoffrey Burnstock
Francesco Di Virgilio
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptors for extracellular nucleotides are widely expressed by mammalian cells. They mediate a large array of responses ranging from growth stimulation to apoptosis, from chemotaxis to cell differentiation and from nociception to cytokine release, as well as neurotransmission. Pharma industry is involved in the development and clinical testing of drugs selectively targeting the different P1 nucleoside and P2 nucleotide receptor subtypes. As described in detail in the present review, P2 receptors are expressed by all tumours, in some cases to a very high level. Activation or inhibition of selected P2 receptor subtypes brings about cancer cell death or growth inhibition. The field has been largely neglected by current research in oncology, yet the evidence presented in this review, most of which is based on in vitro studies, although with a limited amount from in vivo experiments and human studies, warrants further efforts to explore the therapeutic potential of purinoceptor targeting in cancer.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsPurinesReceptors, PurinergicSignal TransductionAdenosine TriphosphateNeoplasm ProteinsPurinesReceptors, Purinergic

Identifiers

PMID23797685
PMCPMC3889385
OpenAlexW2070915732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.