Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23797465›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical research2013

Targeted delivery of nano-therapeutics for major disorders of the central nervous system.

Huile Gao, Zhiqing Pang, Xinguo Jiang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Magnetism in drug delivery: The marvels of iron oxides and substituted ferrites nanoparticles.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huile GaoKey Laboratory of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University) Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
Zhiqing Pang
Xinguo Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including brain tumors, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and stroke, are significant threats to human health. Although impressive advances in the treatment of CNS disorders have been made during the past few decades, the success rates are still moderate if not poor. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) hampers the access of systemically administered drugs to the brain. The development of nanotechnology provides powerful tools to deliver therapeutics to target sites. Anchoring them with specific ligands can endow the nano-therapeutics with the appropriate properties to circumvent the BBB. In this review, the potential nanotechnology-based targeted drug delivery strategies for different CNS disorders are described. The limitations and future directions of brain-targeted delivery systems are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System AgentsCentral Nervous System DiseasesDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesNeuroprotective AgentsPharmaceutical PreparationsCentral Nervous System AgentsDrug CarriersNeuroprotective AgentsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.