Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23797285›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2014

A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia.

Ryan J Farris, Hugo A Quintero, Spencer A Murray, Kevin H Ha, Clare Hartigan, Michael Goldfarb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02680496 (Energy Consumption and Cardiorespiratory Load During Walking With and Without Robot-Assistance), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02680496 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Energy Consumption and Cardiorespiratory Load During Walking With and Without Robot-Assistance

TypeinterventionalSponsorVrije Universiteit BrusselRan2016 to 2017Enrolled14ConditionsStrokeArmsLokomat, Treadmill, Overground
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of a powered ankle-foot orthosis on perturbed standing balance.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryan J Farris
Hugo A Quintero
Spencer A Murray
Kevin H Ha
Clare Hartigan
Michael Goldfarb

Funding

A Joint-Coupled Controlled-Brake Orthosis System for Hybrid FES Gait RestorationR01HD059832 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDFARB, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS 1R01HD059832-01A1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of a lower limb exoskeleton for providing legged mobility to people with paraplegia. In particular, the paper presents a single-subject case study comparing legged locomotion using the exoskeleton to locomotion using knee-ankle-foot orthoses (KAFOs) on a subject with a T10 motor and sensory complete injury. The assessment utilizes three assessment instruments to characterize legged mobility, which are the timed up-and-go test, the Ten-Meter Walk Test (10 MWT), and the Six-Minute Walk Test (6 MWT), which collectively assess the subject's ability to stand, walk, turn, and sit. The exertion associated with each assessment instrument was assessed using the Physiological Cost Index. Results indicate that the subject was able to perform the respective assessment instruments 25%, 70%, and 80% faster with the exoskeleton relative to the KAFOs for the timed up-and-go test, the 10 MWT, and the 6 MWT, respectively. Measurements of exertion indicate that the exoskeleton requires 1.6, 5.2, and 3.2 times less exertion than the KAFOs for each respective assessment instrument. The results indicate that the enhancement in speed and reduction in exertion are more significant during walking than during gait transitions.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsLower ExtremityAdultHeart RateHumansMaleMovementParaplegiaPhysical ExertionProsthesis DesignSpinal Cord InjuriesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23797285
PMCPMC4476394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.