Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23796988›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2013

Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) predicts survival and leukemic evolution of myelodysplastic syndromes significantly better than IPSS and WHO Prognostic Scoring System: validation by the Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie Italian Regional Database.

Maria Teresa Voso, Susanna Fenu, Roberto Latagliata, Francesco Buccisano, Alfonso Piciocchi, Maria Antonietta Aloe-Spiriti, Massimo Breccia, Marianna Criscuolo, Alessandro Andriani, Stefano Mancini and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Myelodysplastic syndromes, version 2.2015.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2015
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Prognostic significance red blood cell distribution width in myelodysplastic syndromes].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Have we reached a molecular era in myelodysplastic syndromes?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. LINC01255 combined with BMI1 to regulate human mesenchymal stromal senescence and acute myeloid leukemia cell proliferation through repressing transcription of MCP-1.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Teresa VosoDepartment of Hematology, Universita' Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy. mtvoso@rm.unicatt.it
Susanna Fenu
Roberto Latagliata
Francesco Buccisano
Alfonso Piciocchi
Maria Antonietta Aloe-Spiriti
Massimo Breccia
Marianna Criscuolo
Alessandro Andriani
Stefano Mancini
Pasquale Niscola
Virginia Naso
Carolina Nobile
Anna Lina Piccioni
Mariella D'Andrea
Ada D'Addosio
Giuseppe Leone
Adriano Venditti
Villa Maria Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe definition of disease-specific prognostic scores plays a fundamental role in the treatment decision-making process in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a group of myeloid disorders characterized by a heterogeneous clinical behavior. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe applied the recently published Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) to 380 patients with MDS, registered in an Italian regional database, recruiting patients from the city of Rome (Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie). Patients were selected based on the availability of IPSS-R prognostic factors, including complete peripheral-blood and bone marrow counts, informative cytogenetics, and follow-up data.

resultsWe validated the IPSS-R score as a significant predictor of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in MDS (P < .001 for both). When comparing the prognostic value of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and IPSS-R, using the Cox regression model and the likelihood ratio test, a significantly higher predictive power for LFS and OS became evident for the IPSS-R, compared with the IPSS and WPSS (P < .001 for both). The multivariate analysis, including IPSS, WPSS, age, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin concentration, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, transfusion dependency, and type of therapy, confirmed the significant prognostic value of IPSS-R subgroups for LFS and OS. Treatment with lenalidomide and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was shown to be an independent predictor of survival in the multivariate analysis.

conclusionOur data confirm that the IPSS-R is an excellent prognostic tool in MDS in the era of disease-modifying treatments. The early recognition of patients at high risk of progression to aggressive disease may optimize treatment timing in MDS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesPrognosisResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23796988
OpenAlexW2151282491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.