Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23795226›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2012

A HIERARCHICAL MAX-STABLE SPATIAL MODEL FOR EXTREME PRECIPITATION.

Brian J Reich, Benjamin A Shaby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Valid model-free spatial prediction.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flexible and Fast Spatial Return Level Estimation Via a Spatially Fused Penalty.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2021
    Article
  6. Probabilistic reanalysis of storm surge extremes in Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A marginal cure rate proportional hazards model for spatial survival data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian J ReichDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27560 brian_reich@ncsu.edu.
Benjamin A Shaby

Funding

Space-time Modeling for Linking Climate Change,Pollutant Exposure, Built EnvironmR01ES014843 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI REICH, BRIAN J. · 2008 to 2013
$2.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extreme environmental phenomena such as major precipitation events manifestly exhibit spatial dependence. Max-stable processes are a class of asymptotically-justified models that are capable of representing spatial dependence among extreme values. While these models satisfy modeling requirements, they are limited in their utility because their corresponding joint likelihoods are unknown for more than a trivial number of spatial locations, preventing, in particular, Bayesian analyses. In this paper, we propose a new random effects model to account for spatial dependence. We show that our specification of the random effect distribution leads to a max-stable process that has the popular Gaussian extreme value process (GEVP) as a limiting case. The proposed model is used to analyze the yearly maximum precipitation from a regional climate model.

Indexed as

Gaussian extreme value processgeneralized extreme value distributionpositive stable distributionregional climate model

Identifiers

PMID23795226
PMCPMC3689230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.