SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Pooled it
- Oral herbal medicine for women with intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for non-alcohol related fatty liver disease (NAFLD): an attempted network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for generalised itching (not caused by systemic disease or skin lesions) in pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- S-adenosyl-L-methionine for the treatment of chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Ursodeoxycholic acid in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a secondary analysis of the PITCHES trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021Trial
- Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2019Trial
- Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and early term delivery versus expectant management, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: semifactorial randomised clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Trial
- The Latest on Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy - Update 2026.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- Integrating bile acid metabolism into precision nutrition strategies for improved swine performance.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026Review
- Investigating the risks of late preterm and term neonatal morbidity across clinical subtypes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Genetically predicted lipids mediate the association between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical Management Guidelines for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- The Pathological Effects of Circulating Hydrophobic Bile Acids in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports · 2023Review
- Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2021Article
- A multi-centre, open label, randomised, parallel-group, superiority Trial to compare the efficacy of URsodeoxycholic acid with RIFampicin in the management of women with severe early onset Intrahepatic Cholestasis of pregnancy: the TURRIFIC randomised trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- [Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy].Der Gynakologe · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObstetric cholestasis has been linked to adverse maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes. As the pathophysiology is poorly understood, therapies have been empiric. The first version of this review, published in 2001, and including nine randomised controlled trials involving 227 women, concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend any of the interventions alone or in combination. This is the first update.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic and delivery interventions in women with cholestasis of pregnancy. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (20 February 2013) and reference lists of identified studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials that compared two intervention strategies for women with a clinical diagnosis of obstetric cholestasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and risk of bias. We independently extracted data and checked these for accuracy. MAIN
resultsWe included 21 trials with a total of 1197 women. They were mostly at moderate to high risk of bias. They assessed 11 different interventions resulting in 15 different comparisons.Compared with placebo, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) showed improvement in pruritus in five (228 women) out of seven trials. There were no significant differences in instances of fetal distress in the UDCA groups compared with placebo (average risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 2.02; five trials, 304 women; random-effects analysis: T² = 0.74; I² = 48%). There were significantly fewer total preterm births with UDCA (RR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.73; two trials, 179 women). The difference for spontaneous preterm births was not significant (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.41 to 2.36, two trials, 109 women).Two trials (48 women) reported lower (better) pruritus scores for S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) compared with placebo, while two other trials of 34 women reported no significant differences between groups.UDCA was more effective in improving pruritus than either SAMe (four trials; 133 women) or cholestyramine (one trial; 84 women), as was combined UDCA+SAMe when compared with placebo (one trial; 16 women) and SAMe alone (two trials; 68 women). However, combined UDCA+SAMe was no more effective than UDCA alone in regard to pruritus improvement (one trial; 53 women) and two trials (80 women) reported data were insufficient to draw any conclusions from. In one trial comparing UDCA and dexamethasone (83 women), a significant improvement with UDCA was seen only in a subgroup of women with severe obstetric cholestasis (23 women).Danxiaoling significantly improved pruritus in comparison to Yiganling. No significant differences were seen in pruritus improvement with other interventions.Eight trials reported fetal or neonatal deaths, with two deaths reported overall (both in the placebo groups).Women receiving UDCA and cholestyramine experienced nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Guar gum caused mild abdominal distress, diarrhoea and flatulence during the first days of treatment. Women found charcoal suspension unpleasant to swallow. Dexamethasone caused nausea, dizziness and stomach pain in one woman.One trial (62 women) looked at the timing of delivery intervention. There were no stillbirths or neonatal deaths in 'early delivery' or the 'await spontaneous labour' group. There were no significant differences in the rates of caesarean section, meconium passage or admission to neonatal intensive care unit between the two groups. AUTHORS'
conclusionsDifferent approaches to assessing and reporting pruritus precluded pooling of trials comparing the effects of UDCA versus placebo on pruritus, but examination of individual trials suggests that UDCA significantly improves pruritus, albeit by a small amount. Fewer instances of fetal distress/asphyxial events were seen in the UDCA groups when compared with placebo but the difference was not statistically significant. Large trials of UDCA to determine fetal benefits or risks are needed.A single trial was too small to rule in or out a clinically important effect of early term delivery on caesarean section.There is insufficient evidence to indicate that SAMe, guar gum, activated charcoal, dexamethasone, cholestyramine, Salvia, Yinchenghao decoction (YCHD), Danxioling and Yiganling, or Yiganling alone or in combination are effective in treating women with cholestasis of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.