Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23794263›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2013

Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study.

Saskia C Sanderson, Michael A Diefenbach, Randi Zinberg, Carol R Horowitz, Margaret Smirnoff, Micol Zweig, Samantha Streicher, Ethylin Wang Jabs, Lynne D Richardson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Latin American Trans-ancestry INitiative for OCD genomics (LATINO): Study protocol.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia C SandersonDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA, saskia.sanderson@mssm.edu.
Michael A Diefenbach
Randi Zinberg
Carol R Horowitz
Margaret Smirnoff
Micol Zweig
Samantha Streicher
Ethylin Wang Jabs
Lynne D Richardson
Child Health and Development Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

MOUNT SINAI INSTITUTES FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR029887 · NCRR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SAMPSON, HUGH A · 2009 to 2011
$19.2M
Mount Sinai Institutes for Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000067 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SAMPSON, HUGH A · 2012 to 2014
$16.5M
Genomic Medicine Pilot For Hypertension And Kidney Disease In Primary CareU01HG007278 · NHGRI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI HOROWITZ, CAROL R · 2013 to 2018
$5.7M
Biorepository for Genomic Medicine in diverse CommunitiesU01HG006380 · NHGRI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI BOTTINGER, ERWIN P. · 2011 to 2015
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000067NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029887NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006380NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients from traditionally underrepresented communities need to be involved in discussions around genomics research including attitudes towards participation and receiving personal results. Structured interviews, including open-ended and closed-ended questions, were conducted with 205 patients in an inner-city hospital outpatient clinic: 48 % of participants self-identified as Black or African American, 29 % Hispanic, 10 % White; 49 % had an annual household income of <$20,000. When the potential for personal results to be returned was not mentioned, 82 % of participants were willing to participate in genomics research. Reasons for willingness fell into four themes: altruism; benefit to family members; personal health benefit; personal curiosity and improving understanding. Reasons for being unwilling fell into five themes: negative perception of research; not personally relevant; negative feelings about procedures (e.g., blood draws); practical barriers; and fear of results. Participants were more likely to report that they would participate in genomics research if personal results were offered than if they were not offered (89 vs. 62 % respectively, p < 0.001). Participants were more interested in receiving personal genomic risk results for cancer, heart disease and type 2 diabetes than obesity (89, 89, 91, 80 % respectively, all p < 0.001). The only characteristic consistently associated with interest in receiving personal results was disease-specific worry. There was considerable willingness to participate in and desire for personal results from genomics research in this sample of predominantly low-income, Hispanic and African American patients. When returning results is not practical, or even when it is, alternatively or additionally providing generic information about genomics and health may also be a valuable commodity to underrepresented minority and other populations considering participating in genomics research.

Identifiers

PMID23794263
PMCPMC3773313
OpenAlexW2043500941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.