Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23794198›Full record

Observational studyJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2014

Risk factors for treatment failure with antiosteoporosis medication: the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women (GLOW).

Adolfo Díez-Pérez, Jonathan D Adachi, Silvano Adami, Frederick A Anderson, Steven Boonen, Roland Chapurlat, Juliet E Compston, Cyrus Cooper, Stephen H Gehlbach, Susan L Greenspan and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frailty Change and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the Elderly: Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women 3-Year Hamilton Cohort.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Trial
  2. Comorbidity indices for clinical trials: adaptation of two existing indices for use with the FREEDOM trial in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New Horizons: Artificial Intelligence Tools for Managing Osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScanInternational journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Spanish consensus on treat to target for osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diversity in fall characteristics hampers effective prevention: the precipitants, the environment, the fall and the injury.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.

Adolfo Díez-PérezHospital del Mar-IMIM-Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Red Tematica Investigacion en Envejecimiento y Fragilidad (RETICEF), Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan D Adachi
Silvano Adami
Frederick A Anderson
Steven Boonen
Roland Chapurlat
Juliet E Compston
Cyrus Cooper
Stephen H Gehlbach
Susan L Greenspan
Frederick H Hooven
Andrea Z LaCroix
Jeri W Nieves
J Coen Netelenbos
Johannes Pfeilschifter
Maurizio Rossini
Christian Roux
Kenneth G Saag
Stuart Silverman
Ethel S Siris
Allison Wyman
Sophie K Rushton-Smith
Nelson B Watts
Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) Investigators
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Verona · ITAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBAlfried Krupp Hospital · DEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLCancer Research Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USColumbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRHospital Del Mar · ESInserm · FRKU Leuven · BEMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit · GBSt. Joseph's Hospital · CAUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiosteoporosis medication (AOM) does not abolish fracture risk, and some individuals experience multiple fractures while on treatment. Therefore, criteria for treatment failure have recently been defined. Using data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW), we analyzed risk factors for treatment failure, defined as sustaining two or more fractures while on AOM. GLOW is a prospective, observational cohort study of women aged ≥55 years sampled from primary care practices in 10 countries. Self-administered questionnaires collected data on patient characteristics, fracture risk factors, previous fractures, AOM use, and health status. Data were analyzed from women who used the same class of AOM continuously over 3 survey years and had data available on fracture occurrence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of treatment failure. Data from 26,918 women were available, of whom 5550 were on AOM. During follow-up, 73 of 5550 women in the AOM group (1.3%) and 123 of 21,368 in the non-AOM group (0.6%) reported occurrence of two or more fractures. The following variables were associated with treatment failure: lower Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) score (physical function and vitality) at baseline, higher Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score, falls in the past 12 months, selected comorbid conditions, prior fracture, current use of glucocorticoids, need of arms to assist to standing, and unexplained weight loss ≥10 lb (≥4.5 kg). Three variables remained predictive of treatment failure after multivariable analysis: worse SF-36 vitality score (odds ratio [OR] per 10-point increase, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.95; p = 0.004); two or more falls in the past year (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.34-4.29; p = 0.011), and prior fracture (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.81-4.75; p < 0.0001). The C statistic for the model was 0.712. Specific strategies for fracture prevention should therefore be developed for this subgroup of patients.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedBone Density Conservation AgentsComorbidityDiphosphonatesFemaleFractures, BoneHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment FailureBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesANTIRESORPTIVE THERAPYOSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENTRISK FACTORSTREATMENT FAILURE

Identifiers

PMID23794198
PMCPMC4878143
OpenAlexW1596108036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.