Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23794083›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2013

An optimised 3 M KCl salt-bridge technique used to measure and validate theoretical liquid junction potential values in patch-clamping and electrophysiology.

Peter H Barry, Trevor M Lewis, Andrew J Moorhouse

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter H BarryDepartment of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales-UNSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. P.Barry@unsw.edu.au
Trevor M Lewis
Andrew J Moorhouse

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate potential measurements in electrophysiological experiments require correction for liquid junction potentials (LJPs), and, in patch-clamping especially, these can often be ~5-10 mV or more. They can be either calculated, if ion mobilities are known, or measured directly. We describe an optimised system to directly measure LJPs with a patch-clamp amplifier, using as a reference electrode, a freshly-cut 3 M KCl-agar salt-bridge (in polyethylene tubing) with its tip cut off by at least 5 mm during solution changes to eliminate its solution-history-dependent effects. We quantify such history-dependent effects and complement this with a de-novo theoretical analysis of salt diffusion to and from the salt-bridge. Our analysis and experimental results validate the optimised methodology for measuring LJPs, and the use of the Henderson equation for accurately calculating them. The use of this equation is also assessed and generally validated in the light of rigorous Nernst-Planck-Poisson and other numerical simulations and analytical studies of LJPs over recent decades. Digitizing, recording and amplifying the measured potentials increases their accuracy. The measured potentials still need correction for small, well-defined calculable, shifts in LJPs at the 3 M KCl-agar reference. Using this technique, we have measured changes in LJPs for diluted solutions of NaCl, LiCl, KCl, CsCl and NaF, obtaining excellent agreement within ±0.1 mV of predicted values, calculated using ion activities. Our de novo LJP measurements of biionic combinations of the above undiluted salts, and NaI and NaF (with halide anions I⁻ and F⁻), generally also gave excellent agreement with predicted values.

Indexed as

ElectrophysiologyModels, TheoreticalPhysical PhenomenaAgarDiffusionElectrodesIonic LiquidsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPotassium ChlorideReproducibility of ResultsAgarIonic LiquidsPotassium Chloride

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.