ArticleAnimal cognition2014
Repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).
Article in Animal cognition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of daily ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2021Article
- Discrimination learning in oxycodone-treated nonhuman primates.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2020Article
- Effects of chronic cocaine self-administration and N-acetylcysteine on learning, cognitive flexibility, and reinstatement in nonhuman primates.Psychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Role Played by the Passage of Time in Reversal Learning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Touchscreen technology in the study of cognition-related behavior.Behavioural pharmacology · 2017Review
- Touchscreen assays of learning, response inhibition, and motivation in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).Animal cognition · 2016Article
- Comparisons of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Anandamide on a Battery of Cognition-Related Behavior in Nonhuman Primates.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2016Article
- Effects of self-administered methamphetamine on discrimination learning and reversal in nonhuman primates.Psychopharmacology · 2016Article
- Reversal Learning in Humans and Gerbils: Dynamic Control Network Facilitates Learning.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Effects of prior cocaine self-administration on cognitive performance in female cynomolgus monkeys.Psychopharmacology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal tasks are often used to examine behavioral relations of, respectively, learning and cognitive flexibility. Surprisingly, despite their frequent use in cognitive neuroscience and behavioral pharmacology, variables that control performance under these two tasks have not been widely studied. The present studies were conducted to directly investigate the controlling variables in nonhuman primates. Squirrel monkeys were trained with a touchscreen variant of the repeated acquisition task in which a novel pair of S(+)/S(-) stimuli was presented daily. Subjects learned to discriminate the two stimuli (acquisition) and, subsequently, with the contingencies switched (reversal). Results indicate that rates of both acquisition and reversal learning increased across successive sessions, but that rate of reversal learning remained slower than acquisition learning, i.e., more trials were needed for mastery. Subsequent experiments showed this difference between the rate of learning novel discriminations and reversal was reliable for at least 5 days between acquisition and reversal and notwithstanding the interpolation of additional discriminations. Experimental analysis of the S(+)/S(-) elements of the tasks revealed that the difference in the rate of learning could not be attributed to a relatively aversive quality of the S(-) or to a relatively appetitive quality of the S(+), but, rather, to contextual control by the S(+)/S(-) stimulus complex. Thus, if either element (S(+) or S(-)) of the stimulus complex was replaced by a novel stimulus, the rate of acquisition approximated that expected with a novel stimulus pair. These results improve our understanding of fundamental features of discrimination acquisition and reversal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.