Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23794073›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2014

Repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus).

Brian D Kangas, Jack Bergman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of daily ΔDrug and alcohol dependence · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role Played by the Passage of Time in Reversal Learning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian D KangasHarvard Medical School, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA, bkangas@mclean.harvard.edu.
Jack Bergman
Harvard University · US

Funding

Cannabinergic Medications for Methamphetamine AddictionR37DA023142 · NIDA · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI MAKRIYANNIS, ALEXANDROS · 2007 to 2016
$7.1M
Drug Self Administration and Withdrawal Effects on Cognitive FunctionK01DA035974 · NIDA · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI KANGAS, BRIAN D. · 2013 to 2017
$743k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA035974NIDA NIH HHS K01-DA035974NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA023142NIDA NIH HHS R37-DA023142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repeated acquisition and discrimination reversal tasks are often used to examine behavioral relations of, respectively, learning and cognitive flexibility. Surprisingly, despite their frequent use in cognitive neuroscience and behavioral pharmacology, variables that control performance under these two tasks have not been widely studied. The present studies were conducted to directly investigate the controlling variables in nonhuman primates. Squirrel monkeys were trained with a touchscreen variant of the repeated acquisition task in which a novel pair of S(+)/S(-) stimuli was presented daily. Subjects learned to discriminate the two stimuli (acquisition) and, subsequently, with the contingencies switched (reversal). Results indicate that rates of both acquisition and reversal learning increased across successive sessions, but that rate of reversal learning remained slower than acquisition learning, i.e., more trials were needed for mastery. Subsequent experiments showed this difference between the rate of learning novel discriminations and reversal was reliable for at least 5 days between acquisition and reversal and notwithstanding the interpolation of additional discriminations. Experimental analysis of the S(+)/S(-) elements of the tasks revealed that the difference in the rate of learning could not be attributed to a relatively aversive quality of the S(-) or to a relatively appetitive quality of the S(+), but, rather, to contextual control by the S(+)/S(-) stimulus complex. Thus, if either element (S(+) or S(-)) of the stimulus complex was replaced by a novel stimulus, the rate of acquisition approximated that expected with a novel stimulus pair. These results improve our understanding of fundamental features of discrimination acquisition and reversal.

Indexed as

Discrimination LearningReversal LearningAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalMaleReinforcement, PsychologySaimiri

Identifiers

PMID23794073
PMCPMC3844073
OpenAlexW2095428795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.