ReviewProtein & cell2013
Co-evolution of plant LTR-retrotransposons and their host genomes.
Review in Protein & cell, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome evolution and transposable element expansion reveal host-associated genomic features in Cladosporium cucumerinum.Communications biology · 2026Article
- LTR retrotransposons shape genome architecture, function, and evolution in diverse plant species.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Analysis genome of Pseudotaxus chienii reveals insights into the origin and evolution of taxane biosynthesis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A chromosome-level genome assembly reveals triterpenoid biosynthesis in Clinopodium chinense.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Integration of Repeatome and Cytogenetic Data on Tandem DNAs in a Medicinal PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- DNAJ protein gene expansion mechanism in Panicoideae and PgDNAJ functional identification in pearl millet.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Karyotype and LTR-RTs analysis provide insights into oak genomic evolution.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Chromosome-Scale Genome Assembly for Clubrush (Bolboschoenus planiculmis) Indicates a Karyotype with High Chromosome Number and Heterogeneous Centromere Distribution.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The haplotype-resolved telomere-to-telomere carnation (Horticulture research · 2024Article
- A Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the Casparian Strip Membrane Domain Protein-like Gene Family inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A reference-grade genome assembly for Astragalus mongholicus and insights into the biosynthesis and high accumulation of triterpenoids and flavonoids in its roots.Plant communications · 2023Article
- Haplotype-Resolved Genome Analyses Reveal Genetically Distinct Nuclei within a Commercial Cultivar ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The complete chloroplast genomes of three Hamamelidaceae species: Comparative and phylogenetic analyses.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Large-scale discovery of non-conventional peptides in grape (Horticulture research · 2022Article
- A High-Quality, Chromosome-Level Genome Provides Insights Into Determinate Flowering Time and Color of Cotton Rose (Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Full-length LTR retroelements in Capsicum annuum revealed a few species-specific family bursts with insertional preferences.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2021Article
- Long Terminal Repeat RetrotransposonAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Coconut genome assembly enables evolutionary analysis of palms and highlights signaling pathways involved in salt tolerance.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Genome Size Evolution Mediated by Gypsy Retrotransposons in Brassicaceae.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs), particularly, long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs), are the most abundant DNA components in all plant species that have been investigated, and are largely responsible for plant genome size variation. Although plant genomes have experienced periodic proliferation and/or recent burst of LTR-retrotransposons, the majority of LTR-RTs are inactivated by DNA methylation and small RNA-mediated silencing mechanisms, and/or were deleted/truncated by unequal homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination, as suppression mechanisms that counteract genome expansion caused by LTR-RT amplification. LTR-RT DNA is generally enriched in pericentromeric regions of the host genomes, which appears to be the outcomes of preferential insertions of LTR-RTs in these regions and low effectiveness of selection that purges LTR-RT DNA from these regions relative to chromosomal arms. Potential functions of various TEs in their host genomes remain blurry; nevertheless, LTR-RTs have been recognized to play important roles in maintaining chromatin structures and centromere functions and regulation of gene expressions in their host genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.