ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2013
A critical analysis of clinical outcomes reported in stem cell trials for acute myocardial infarction: some thoughts for design of future trials.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- An update on stem cell therapies for acute coronary syndrome.Current cardiology reports · 2014Review
- A training program in cardiovascular cell-based therapy: from the NHLBI Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network.Regenerative medicine · 2014Article
- Experimental study on the effect of intravenous stem cell therapy on intestinal ischemia reperfusion induced myocardial injury.International journal of stem cells · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction is to improve clinical outcomes, and detailed information on clinical outcomes is critical to appropriate planning of phase III trials. We have examined data from select phase II trials using autologous bone-marrow-derived stem cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We have extracted available definitions and outcome data, and have generated standardized estimates of events to permit summary comparisons. Nine trials (1,040 patients) with results for 6 months to 5 years were evaluated. Adverse outcomes differed widely, and there was a general lack of details in the definitions of these outcomes. Heart-failure-related hospitalizations occurred in only 16 patients (1.5 %) and death occurred in only 43 patients (4.1 %). Ischemia-related outcomes outnumbered heart failure outcomes more than tenfold. Uniform criteria need to be developed to better define clinical outcomes of interest. Furthermore, a refocus from heart failure outcomes to ischemia-related outcomes seems appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.