Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793616›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2013

Carotid artery stenting using the proximal or dual protection method for near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery.

Shigeyuki Sakamoto, Yoshihiro Kiura, Yosuke Kajihara, Masaaki Shibukawa, Takahito Okazaki, Toshinori Matsushige, Katsuhiro Shinagawa, Kazutoshi Mukada, Kaoru Kurisu

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shigeyuki SakamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, 1-2-3 Kasumi,, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan, sakamoto@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Yoshihiro Kiura
Yosuke Kajihara
Masaaki Shibukawa
Takahito Okazaki
Toshinori Matsushige
Katsuhiro Shinagawa
Kazutoshi Mukada
Kaoru Kurisu
Hiroshima University · JPHiroshima General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment for patients with near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) as a surgical treatment for ICA near occlusion. Between April 2008 and September 2012, 14 patients (all men; mean age, 75.4 years) with ICA near occlusion were treated with CAS. This represents 5.2% of a total of 267 patients treated with CAS during the study period. All patients were treated with CAS using an embolic protection device. The proximal balloon protection method was performed in five patients, and the dual protection method using a proximal balloon and distal filter protection was used in nine patients. We examined the change of stenotic lesion, hyperintensity spot in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perioperative complications after CAS. All near occlusions were successfully dilated. Among 2 of 14 patients, DWI showed 1 and 4 hyperintensity spots. Transient and persistent complications, including neurological deficits, did not occur in any patients. In this small number of cases, CAS using the proximal or dual embolic protection method seems to be a safe and beneficial treatment for ICA near occlusion.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAged, 80 and overAngioplasty, BalloonCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDilatationEmbolismEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFemoral VeinHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMale

Identifiers

PMID23793616
OpenAlexW2044690910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.