Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793562›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in oncology2013

Health care disparities in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Kelly Dorsey, Zheng Zhou, Rawia Masaoud, Halla S Nimeiri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly DorseyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Zheng Zhou
Rawia Masaoud
Halla S Nimeiri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementTreatment of colorectal carcinoma remains challenging, especially in patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. Despite advances in screening and treatment of this cancer, health care disparities remain one of the major yet amendable factors that can lead to differences in outcomes. As clinicians, we need to be aware of such disparities to better tailor our screening and treatment interventions for our patients. Knowing that socioeconomic status, educational status, and personal beliefs contribute to racial disparities in this disease, as clinicians we should strive to know our patients and their beliefs to help minimize this discrepancy. Additionally, we need to maintain and advance our knowledge by keeping up with all clinical and translational research in the field and create strategies to increase enrollment of racial minorities in clinical trials. While conventional chemotherapies continue to play a vital role, it is becoming more and more evident that treatment strategies need to be personalized. Understanding the molecular biology of cancer has changed the landscape of new therapies. Future research needs to be directed towards understanding genetic, biological, and pharmacogenetic and genomic contributors to the development of disease and treatment responses.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealthcare DisparitiesColorectal NeoplasmsHumansSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.