Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793548›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2013

Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT.

Xiaodong Yuan, Jing Zhang, Changbin Quan, Jianxia Cao, Guokun Ao, Yuan Tian, Hong Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02316327 (Phase IV/II Open-label Study to Evaluate Prompt Response to Treatment With Cisplatin, Gemcitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-small Lung Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02316327 phase4completednot on this map

Phase IV/II Open-label Study to Evaluate Prompt Response to Treatment With Cisplatin, Gemcitabine and Bevacizumab in Patients With Non-small Lung Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion Clinic per a la Recerca BiomédicaRan2013 to 2016Enrolled19ConditionsNon-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)Armsgemcitabine, cisplatin and bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic Performance of Perfusion Computed Tomography for Differentiating Lung Cancer from Benign Lesions: A Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-Temporal-Resolution Kinetic Modeling of Lung Tumors with Dual-Blood Input Function Using Total-Body Dynamic PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Value of ultrasound guided biopsy combined with XpertWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. A Novel Deep Learning Model to Distinguish Malignant Versus Benign Solid Lung Nodules.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. EJNMMI research · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodong YuanDepartment of Radiology, the 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 17 Heishanhu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100091, People's Republic of China.
Jing Zhang
Changbin Quan
Jianxia Cao
Guokun Ao
Yuan Tian
Hong Li
The 309th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess diagnostic performance of dual-input CT perfusion for distinguishing malignant from benign solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).

methodsFifty-six consecutive subjects with SPNs underwent contrast-enhanced 320-row multidetector dynamic volume CT. The dual-input maximum slope CT perfusion analysis was employed to calculate the pulmonary flow (PF), bronchial flow (BF), and perfusion index [Formula: see text]. Differences in perfusion parameters between malignant and benign tumours were assessed with histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard. Diagnostic value of the perfusion parameters was calculated using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

resultsAmongst 56 SPNs, statistically significant differences in all three perfusion parameters were revealed between malignant and benign tumours. The PI demonstrated the biggest difference between malignancy and benignancy: 0.30 ± 0.07 vs. 0.51 ± 0.13 , P < 0.001. The area under the PI ROC curve was 0.92, the largest of the three perfusion parameters, producing a sensitivity of 0.95, specificity of 0.83, positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 5.59, and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of 0.06 in identifying malignancy.

conclusionsThe PI derived from the dual-input maximum slope CT perfusion analysis is a valuable biomarker for identifying malignancy in SPNs. PI may be potentially useful for lung cancer treatment planning and forecasting the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy treatment. KEY POINTS: • Modern CT equipment offers assessment of vascular parameters of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) • Dual vascular supply was investigated to differentiate malignant from benign SPNs. • Different dual vascular supply patterns were found in malignant and benign SPNs. • The perfusion index is a useful biomarker for differentiate malignancy from benignancy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsBiomarkersFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionProspective StudiesRadiotherapyReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23793548
OpenAlexW2039910147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.