Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793531›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2014

Voluntary versus involuntary hospital admission in child and adolescent psychiatry: a German sample.

Jasmin Jendreyschak, Franciska Illes, Knut Hoffmann, Martin Holtmann, Claus-Rüdiger Haas, Falk Burchard, Barbara Emons, Markus Schaub, Carina Armgart, Hildegard Schnieder and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. I'm not a diagnosis: Adolescents' perspectives on user participation and shared decision-making in mental healthcare.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmin JendreyschakDepartment of Psychiatry, LWL-University Hospital Bochum, Alexandrinenstr. 1, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Franciska Illes
Knut Hoffmann
Martin Holtmann
Claus-Rüdiger Haas
Falk Burchard
Barbara Emons
Markus Schaub
Carina Armgart
Hildegard Schnieder
Georg Juckel
Ida-Sibylle Haussleiter
LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum · DELandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe · DELWL-Universitätsklinik Hamm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Involuntary psychiatric admission is a central issue in mental health care, especially in the treatment of children and adolescents. Its legal regulations do not only differ between European countries, but also on a federal level. Only few studies so far dealt with rates of involuntary admission (RIA), mainly focusing on adults, rather than children and adolescents. None of the studies analyzed this topic in a large cohort. The aim of this regional cross-sectional study was to compare voluntary and involuntary admissions in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) regarding personal and admission characteristics. Furthermore, risk factors and predictors of involuntary admission should be identified. A retrospective analysis of hospital admission registers from three major German CAP hospitals over a period of 6 years (2004-2009) was conducted (N = 10,547 inpatients). Group comparisons between involuntarily and voluntarily treated minors and a logistic regression to determine predictors of legal status were performed. Information on harm to self or others prior to the admission, medication and clinical outcome was not available due to data structure. 70.8 % of patients were voluntarily and 29.2 % involuntarily admitted. Both subsamples comprised more males. The RIA decreased consistently over the years, ranging from 25.7 to 32.4 %. The strongest predictor of being admitted involuntarily was suffering from mental retardation (OR = 15.74). Adolescence, substance abuse, psychotic disorders and admission on duty time were also strongly associated (OR > 3). In this first large cohort study on involuntary treatment of children and adolescents in Germany, about every fourth patient was treated involuntarily. Certain personal and disease-related factors increased the risk. Commitment laws and other legal instruments for regulating involuntary placements are inconsistent and a standardized description or systematic analysis is needed. The influence of demographic, institutional variables and care and health services aspects should also be investigated.

Indexed as

CoercionAdolescentAdultChildCommitment of Persons with Psychiatric DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHospitals, PsychiatricHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Admission

Identifiers

PMID23793531
OpenAlexW2074582830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.