Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793522›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Will there ever be a universal Staphylococcus aureus vaccine?

Gerald B Pier

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Application of Rat Models inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Towards sustainable antimicrobial therapies forSustainable microbiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. TBAScientific reports · 2019
    Article
  14. Immunotherapy synergizes with debridement and antibiotic therapy in a murine 1-stage exchange model of MRSA implant-associated osteomyelitis.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerald B PierDivision of Infectious Diseases; Department of Medicine; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA.
Office of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Treatments for Nipah Virus InfectionU54AI057159 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI CLARDY, JON · 2003 to 2013
$113.7M
Virulence and Immunity to StaphylcocciR01AI046706 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PIER, GERALD B · 2001 to 2010
$4.1M
VIRULENCE AND IMMUNITY TO STAPHYLOCOCCIR21AI046706 · NIAID · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI PIER, GERALD B · 2000 to 2000
$418k
NIAID NIH HHS AI057159NIAID NIH HHS AI46706NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046706NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI046706NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing a universal vaccine for S. aureus is a top priority but to date we have only had failures in human clinical trials. Given the plethora of bacterial virulence factors, broad range of the health of humans at-risk for infections, lack of any information regarding immune effectors mediating protection for any manifestation of S. aureus infection and overall competence of this organism as a colonizer, commensal and pathogen, we may just simply have to accept the fact that we will not get a universal vaccine. Antigenic variation is a major challenge for some vaccine targets and for many conserved targets the organism can easily decrease or even eliminate expression to avoid immune effectors without compromise to infectivity and ability to cause disease. Studies of human immune responses similarly have been unable to identify any clear mediators of immunity and data from such studies can only eliminate those found not to be associated with protection or that might serve as a marker for individuals with a higher level of resistance to infection. Animal studies are not predictive of success in humans and unlikely will be except in hindsight if and when we develop an efficacious vaccine. Successful vaccines for other bacteria based on capsular polysaccharides have not worked to date for S. aureus, and laboratory studies combining antibody to the major capsular serotypes and the other S. aureus surface polysaccharide, poly-N-acetyl glucosamine, unexpectedly showed interference not augmentation of immunity. Potential pathways toward vaccine development do exist but for the foreseeable future will be based on empiric approaches derived from laboratory-based in vitro and animal tests and not on inducing a known immune effector that predicts human resistance to infection.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusFemaleHumansMaleantibodyclinical trialsimmunotherapyS. aureusT-cellsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID23793522
PMCPMC3906350
OpenAlexW2090176460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.