ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2013
Prediction of protein amidation sites by feature selection and analysis.
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-translational Modifications of the Protein Termini.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- STE20/PAKA Protein Kinase Gene Releases an Autoinhibitory Domain through Pre-mRNA Alternative Splicing in the DermatophyteInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carboxy-terminal α-amidation is a widespread post-translational modification of proteins found widely in vertebrates and invertebrates. The α-amide group is required for full biological activity, since it may render a peptide more hydrophobic and thus better be able to bind to other proteins, preventing ionization of the C-terminus. However, in particular, the C-terminal amidation is very difficult to detect because experimental methods are often labor-intensive, time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, in silico methods may complement due to their high efficiency. In this study, a computational method was developed to predict protein amidation sites, by incorporating the maximum relevance minimum redundancy method and the incremental feature selection method based on the nearest neighbor algorithm. From a total of 735 features, 41 optimal features were selected and were utilized to construct the final predictor. As a result, the predictor achieved an overall Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.8308. Feature analysis showed that PSSM conservation scores and amino acid factors played the most important roles in the α-amidation site prediction. Site-specific feature analyses showed that features derived from the amidation site itself and adjacent sites were most significant. This method presented could be used as an efficient tool to theoretically predict amidated peptides. And the selected features from our study could shed some light on the in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of the amidation modification, providing guidelines for experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.