Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23793288›Full record

ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2013

[Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. From the standard ECG to analysis of electrograms].

Malte Meesmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 63% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malte MeesmannMedizinische Klinik - Schwerpunkt Kardiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Stiftung Juliusspital Würzburg, Juliuspromenade 19, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland. m.meesmann@juliusspital.de
Stiftung Juliusspital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early diagnosis of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is important because of the associated risk for arterial embolism. Routine ECG recording, however, is not effective in asymptomatic patients. The goal of this article is to show the general practitioner and internist how the search for atrial fibrillation can be made more efficacious. For example, recording an ECG in patients older than 65 years with irregularities in their pulse or repeated ECG recording in patients older than 75 years with hypertension shows improved results in this regard. It is interesting that elements of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, which was developed to predict risk for arterial embolism, are also effective for defining populations to screen for atrial fibrillation. In the subgroup of patients with a pacemaker or implantable converter-defibrillator (ICD), histograms or intracardiac electrograms can be used to identify previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation. The general practitioner should take these results which are usually obtained by a cardiologist into consideration in the follow-up treatment of his or her patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAtrial FibrillationElectrocardiographyHumansPatient SelectionRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID23793288
OpenAlexW2474173094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.