ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography2013
Squeezing the most from every crystal: the fine details of data collection.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the state of crystallography at the dawn of the electron microscopy revolution.Current opinion in structural biology · 2017Review
- The impact of structural genomics: the first quindecennial.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2016Review
- An overview of heavy-atom derivatization of protein crystals.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Review
- Can I solve my structure by SAD phasing? Anomalous signal in SAD phasing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- Lessons from ten years of crystallization experiments at the SGC.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2016Article
- Assessing and maximizing data quality in macromolecular crystallography.Current opinion in structural biology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern synchrotron beamlines offer instrumentation of unprecedented quality, which in turn encourages increasingly marginal experiments, and for these, as much as ever, the ultimate success of data collection depends on the experience, but especially the care, of the experimenter. A representative set of difficult cases has been encountered at the Structural Genomics Consortium, a worldwide structural genomics initiative of which the Oxford site currently deposits three novel human structures per month. Achieving this target relies heavily on frequent visits to the Diamond Light Source, and the variety of crystal systems still demand customized data collection, diligent checks and careful planning of each experiment. Here, an overview is presented of the techniques and procedures that have been refined over the years and that are considered synchrotron best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.