Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23792592›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & therapy2013

A Smac mimetic augments the response of urothelial cancer cells to gemcitabine and cisplatin.

Eugene K Lee, Goodwin Jinesh G, Naomi M Laing, Woonyoung Choi, David J McConkey, Ashish M Kamat

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. BH3-mimetics: recent developments in cancer therapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Eugene K LeeDepartment of Urology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX USA.
Goodwin Jinesh GDepartment of Urology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX USA.
Naomi M LaingAstraZeneca R&D; Boston, MA USA.
Woonyoung ChoiDepartment of Urology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX USA.
David J McConkeyDepartment of Urology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX USA.
Ashish M KamatDepartment of Urology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAstraZeneca (Singapore) · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is considered the gold standard for patients with advanced bladder cancer. However, despite initial response, many patients will relapse; therefore, novel salvage treatment strategies are desperately needed. Herein, we studied a mechanism based treatment combination using a Smac mimetic with standard chemotherapy. Using a panel of 10 urothelial cancer cell lines, we exposed them to a combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and a Smac mimetic. Sensitivity was determined using a DNA fragmentation assay. We determined that three cell lines (UMUC-3, UMUC-13, and RT4v6) were considered sensitive to the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin and an additional three cell lines were sensitized to gemcitabine and cisplatin with the addition of the Smac mimetic (UMUC-6, UMUC-12, and UMUC-18). We next explored the constitutive expression of selected members of the IAP family (XIAP, cIAP-1, cIAP-2, and Survivin), the BCL family (BCL-2, BCLXL, and BAX) and Smac using gene expression profiling and western blotting. We determined that RNA and protein expression of SMAC, selected members of the IAP family and members of the BCL family did not correlate to drug sensitivity. Lastly, using an in vivo mouse model, we determined that treatment with the Smac mimetic in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin resulted in increased apoptosis, decreased microvessel density and decreased cellular proliferation. This novel treatment strategy may be effective in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCell ProliferationCisplatinDeoxycytidineDrug SynergismFemaleGemcitabineGenes, bcl-2HeterograftsHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMice, NudeMitochondrial ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosis Regulatory ProteinsCisplatinDeoxycytidineDIABLO protein, humanGemcitabineIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitochondrial Proteinsbladder cancerchemotherapycisplatingemcitabineSMAC mimetic

Identifiers

PMID23792592
PMCPMC3909550
OpenAlexW2055113773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.