ArticleNeuron2013
In search of the ever-elusive positive endozepine.
Article in Neuron, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endogenous benzodiazepine site peptide ligands operating bidirectionally in vivo in neurogenesis and thalamic oscillations.Neurochemical research · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue of Neuron, Christian et al. (2013) provide functional evidence for positive endozepines (positive allosteric modulators of GABAARs) within the thalamic reticular nucleus. These molecules are encoded by the Dbi gene and modulate thalamocortical oscillations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.