Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23791129›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of radiology2014

Competitive advantage of PET/MRI.

Hossein Jadvar, Patrick M Colletti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02433301 (PET/MR-imaging and Circulating Tumour Cells to Evaluate the Response of Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02433301 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

PET/MR-imaging and Circulating Tumour Cells to Evaluate the Response of Chemotherapy in Patients With Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorRikshospitalet University HospitalRan2015 to 2016Enrolled23ConditionsGastroesophageal Junction Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Highlights of articles published in annals of nuclear medicine 2016.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostic efficacy of [Discover oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Occult breast cancer in an older woman: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 2.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hossein JadvarDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: jadvar@usc.edu.
Patrick M CollettiDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

FDG PET-CT in Metastatic Prostate CancerR01CA111613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JADVAR, HOSSEIN · 2005 to 2010
$2.5M
[F18]FMAU in Prostate CancerR21CA142426 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JADVAR, HOSSEIN · 2009 to 2010
$393k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111613NCI NIH HHS R01-CA111613NCI NIH HHS R21 CA142426NCI NIH HHS R21-CA142426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodality imaging has made great strides in the imaging evaluation of patients with a variety of diseases. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is now established as the imaging modality of choice in many clinical conditions, particularly in oncology. While the initial development of combined PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) was in the preclinical arena, hybrid PET/MR scanners are now available for clinical use. PET/MRI combines the unique features of MRI including excellent soft tissue contrast, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, fMRI and other specialized sequences as well as MR spectroscopy with the quantitative physiologic information that is provided by PET. Most evidence for the potential clinical utility of PET/MRI is based on studies performed with side-by-side comparison or software-fused MRI and PET images. Data on distinctive utility of hybrid PET/MRI are rapidly emerging. There are potential competitive advantages of PET/MRI over PET/CT. In general, PET/MRI may be preferred over PET/CT where the unique features of MRI provide more robust imaging evaluation in certain clinical settings. The exact role and potential utility of simultaneous data acquisition in specific research and clinical settings will need to be defined. It may be that simultaneous PET/MRI will be best suited for clinical situations that are disease-specific, organ-specific, related to diseases of the children or in those patients undergoing repeated imaging for whom cumulative radiation dose must be kept as low as reasonably achievable. PET/MRI also offers interesting opportunities for use of dual modality probes. Upon clear definition of clinical utility, other important and practical issues related to business operational model, clinical workflow and reimbursement will also be resolved.

Indexed as

Equipment DesignHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHybridMRIPET

Identifiers

PMID23791129
PMCPMC3800216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.