ArticleEcology and evolution2013
Patterns of ecological specialization among microbial populations in the Red Sea and diverse oligotrophic marine environments.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Enzymes From the Red Sea Brine Pools: Current State and Potential.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Natural Products Repertoire of the Red Sea.Marine drugs · 2020Review
- The Complexity of the Holobiont in the Red Sea CoralMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Prokaryotic Response to Phytodetritus-Derived Organic Material in Epi- and Mesopelagic Antarctic Waters.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Red Sea SAR11 andApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- In Vivo Evaluation of the Toxic Effect of Ethyl Acetate Extracts of Marine Antibiotic Resistance Pseudomonas Species Derived from the Red Sea.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Building a bio-based industry in the Middle East through harnessing the potential of the Red Sea biodiversity.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2017Review
- Metagenomic covariation along densely sampled environmental gradients in the Red Sea.The ISME journal · 2017Article
- Global biogeography of Prochlorococcus genome diversity in the surface ocean.The ISME journal · 2016Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Analyses of the OM43 Clade, Including a Novel Species from the Red Sea, Indicate Ecotype Differentiation among Marine Methylotrophs.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Phylogenetic Diversity, Distribution, and Cophylogeny of Giant Bacteria (Epulopiscium) with their Surgeonfish Hosts in the Red Sea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Not All Particles Are Equal: The Selective Enrichment of Particle-Associated Bacteria from the Mediterranean Sea.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
- Challenges of metagenomics and single-cell genomics approaches for exploring cyanobacterial diversity.Photosynthesis research · 2015Review
- A new class of marine Euryarchaeota group II from the Mediterranean deep chlorophyll maximum.The ISME journal · 2015Article
- Molecular-based approaches to characterize coastal microbial community and their potential relation to the trophic state of Red Sea.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Genomes of planktonic Acidimicrobiales: widening horizons for marine Actinobacteria by metagenomics.mBio · 2015Article
- CoVennTree: a new method for the comparative analysis of large datasets.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Comparative transcriptomics of two environmentally relevant cyanobacteria reveals unexpected transcriptome diversity.The ISME journal · 2014Article
- Egypt's Red Sea coast: phylogenetic analysis of cultured microbial consortia in industrialized sites.Frontiers in microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large swaths of the nutrient-poor surface ocean are dominated numerically by cyanobacteria (Prochlorococcus), cyanobacterial viruses (cyanophage), and alphaproteobacteria (SAR11). How these groups thrive in the diverse physicochemical environments of different oceanic regions remains poorly understood. Comparative metagenomics can reveal adaptive responses linked to ecosystem-specific selective pressures. The Red Sea is well-suited for studying adaptation of pelagic-microbes, with salinities, temperatures, and light levels at the extreme end for the surface ocean, and low nutrient concentrations, yet no metagenomic studies have been done there. The Red Sea (high salinity, high light, low N and P) compares favorably with the Mediterranean Sea (high salinity, low P), Sargasso Sea (low P), and North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (high light, low N). We quantified the relative abundance of genetic functions among Prochlorococcus, cyanophage, and SAR11 from these four regions. Gene frequencies indicate selection for phosphorus acquisition (Mediterranean/Sargasso), DNA repair and high-light responses (Red Sea/Pacific Prochlorococcus), and osmolyte C1 oxidation (Red Sea/Mediterranean SAR11). The unexpected connection between salinity-dependent osmolyte production and SAR11 C1 metabolism represents a potentially major coevolutionary adaptation and biogeochemical flux. Among Prochlorococcus and cyanophage, genes enriched in specific environments had ecotype distributions similar to nonenriched genes, suggesting that inter-ecotype gene transfer is not a major source of environment-specific adaptation. Clustering of metagenomes using gene frequencies shows similarities in populations (Red Sea with Pacific, Mediterranean with Sargasso) that belie their geographic distances. Taken together, the genetic functions enriched in specific environments indicate competitive strategies for maintaining carrying capacity in the face of physical stressors and low nutrient availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.