Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23788967›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2013

Evaluation of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy as the second or further-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Bożena Cybulska-Stopa, Marek Ziobro, Marta Skoczek, Ewelina Kojs-Pasińska, Ida Cedrych, Anna Brandys

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bożena Cybulska-StopaDepartment of Systemic and Generalized Malignancies, Department of Centre of Oncology Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Centre, Krakow, Poland.
Marek Ziobro
Marta Skoczek
Ewelina Kojs-Pasińska
Ida Cedrych
Anna Brandys
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyThe study examined the response rate, response duration and toxicity of vinorelbine and fluorouracil or vinorelbine alone in pretreated metastatic breast cancer. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween June 2001 and September 2009, a group of 103 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, who had progressed after anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy, was treated with a vinorelbine-based regimen. The treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m(2) administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle (53 patients) or vinorelbine alone at a dose of 30 mg/m(2) on day 1 and 8 of the cycle, every 3 weeks (50 patients). Patients received chemotherapy as a second or further line of therapy. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median age of patients treated with vinorelbine with 5FU was 54 years (range 38-76), and 55.5 years (range 38-73) in the group receiving vinorelbine monotherapy. A total of 417 cycles of chemotherapy were administered - 177 cycles of vinorelbine with 5-FU and 137 cycles of vinorelbine monotherapy. Patients were treated for a median of 4 cycles (range: 1 to 11 cycles). The evaluation of treatment effect was possible in 93 patients (10 patients received only one treatment cycle).

resultsThe overall response rate (ORR) was 17% (7), including 2 (4%) complete responses (CR) and 5 (10.5%) partial responses (PR). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 50% of patients receiving vinorelbine with 5-FU (24 patients). In a group receiving vinorelbine alone the ORR was 20% (9), including 9 PR (20%) and 16 SD (35.5%). The median time to progression (TTP) for the entire group was 18 weeks (95% CI), 22 weeks among patients treated with vinorelbine with 5-FU and 16 weeks for a second group. The most common hematologic adverse events were neutropenia (20% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (4%), with grade 3/4 incidence of 8% and 1.5% [according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC)]. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent non-hematologic forms of toxicity, occurring in 13% of cycles. The doses of cytotoxics were reduced in 26 (25%) cases. There were no treatment-related deaths.

conclusionsVinorelbine alone or in combination with 5-FU is an effective and safe treatment for pretreated advanced/ metastatic breast cancer patients. The combination of vinorelbine with 5-FU appears to be a more efficacious regimen than vinorelbine alone.

Indexed as

breast cancerchemotherapymetastasiswinorelbine

Identifiers

PMID23788967
PMCPMC3685356
OpenAlexW2093589630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.