Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23788621›Full record

ReviewGenes & development2013

A double take on bivalent promoters.

Philipp Voigt, Wee-Wei Tee, Danny Reinberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & development, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 494 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
494citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

494 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cardiac epigenome in heart development and disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stochastic modeling of epigenetic memory.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

434 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philipp VoigtHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Wee-Wei Tee
Danny Reinberg

Funding

Initiation of Transcription of Protein Coding GenesR37GM037120 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI REINBERG, DANNY · 2004 to 2013
$4.5M
Transcription Regulation by NC2R01GM064844 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI REINBERG, DANNY · 2002 to 2014
$3.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM064844NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064844NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM037120NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM037120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone modifications and chromatin-associated protein complexes are crucially involved in the control of gene expression, supervising cell fate decisions and differentiation. Many promoters in embryonic stem (ES) cells harbor a distinctive histone modification signature that combines the activating histone H3 Lys 4 trimethylation (H3K4me3) mark and the repressive H3K27me3 mark. These bivalent domains are considered to poise expression of developmental genes, allowing timely activation while maintaining repression in the absence of differentiation signals. Recent advances shed light on the establishment and function of bivalent domains; however, their role in development remains controversial, not least because suitable genetic models to probe their function in developing organisms are missing. Here, we explore avenues to and from bivalency and propose that bivalent domains and associated chromatin-modifying complexes safeguard proper and robust differentiation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCell DifferentiationDNA MethylationEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansPromoter Regions, Geneticbivalent domainschromatinembryonic stem cellsPolycombTrithorax

Identifiers

PMID23788621
PMCPMC3701188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.