ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2013
Effects of flanking loops on membrane insertion of transmembrane helices: a role for peptide conformational equilibrium.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconciling structural and thermodynamic predictions using all-atom and coarse-grain force fields: the case of charged oligo-arginine translocation into DMPC bilayers.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of a transmembrane helix (TMH) to insert into a lipid bilayer has been mainly understood based on the total hydrophobicity of the peptide sequence. Recently, Hedin et al. investigated the influence of flanking loops on membrane insertion of a set of marginally hydrophobic TMHs using translocon-based membrane integration assays. While the flanking loops were found to facilitate the insertion in most cases, counter examples also emerged where the flanking loops hinder membrane insertion and contradict the hydrophobicity and charge distribution analyses. Here, coarse-grained free energy calculations and atomistic simulations were performed to investigate the energetics and conformational details of the membrane insertion of two representative marginally hydrophobic TMHs with (NhaL and EmrL) and without (NhaA and EmrD) the flanking loops. The simulations fail to directly recapitulate the contrasting effects of the flanking loops for these two TMHs, due to systematic overprediction of the stabilities of the transmembrane states that has also been consistently observed in previous studies. Nonetheless, detailed force decomposition and peptide conformation analyses suggest a novel mechanism on how the peptide conformational equilibrium in the aqueous phase may modulate the effects of flanking loops on membrane insertion. Specifically, the flanking loops in peptide EmrL interact strongly with the TMH segment and form stable compact conformations in the aqueous phase, which can hinder membrane absorption and insertion as these processes require extended conformations with minimal interactions between the flanking loops and TMH segment. This work also emphasizes the general importance of considering the peptide conformational equilibrium for understanding the mechanism and energetics of membrane insertion, an aspect that has not yet been sufficiently addressed in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.