Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23785327›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2013

Multiple faces elicit augmented neural activity.

Aina Puce, Marie E McNeely, Michael E Berrebi, James C Thompson, Jillian Hardee, Julie Brefczynski-Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Differences in resting state and task-based EEG measures between patients with major depressive disorder and healthy controls.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  4. The Neural Dynamics of Face Ensemble and Central Face Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Elucidating the Neural Representation and the Processing Dynamics of Face Ensembles.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Fear boosts the early neural coding of faces.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  10. Face-to-face: Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aina PuceDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging, School of Medicine, West Virginia University Morgantown, WV, USA ; Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University Morgantown, WV, USA ; Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University Morgantown, WV, USA ; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, IN, USA.
Marie E McNeely
Michael E Berrebi
James C Thompson
Jillian Hardee
Julie Brefczynski-Lewis

Funding

The neural basis of social cognitionR01NS049436 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI PUCE, AINA · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do our brains respond when we are being watched by a group of people?Despite the large volume of literature devoted to face processing, this question has received very little attention. Here we measured the effects on the face-sensitive N170 and other ERPs to viewing displays of one, two and three faces in two experiments. In Experiment 1, overall image brightness and contrast were adjusted to be constant, whereas in Experiment 2 local contrast and brightness of individual faces were not manipulated. A robust positive-negative-positive (P100-N170-P250) ERP complex and an additional late positive ERP, the P400, were elicited to all stimulus types. As the number of faces in the display increased, N170 amplitude increased for both stimulus sets, and latency increased in Experiment 2. P100 latency and P250 amplitude were affected by changes in overall brightness and contrast, but not by the number of faces in the display per se. In Experiment 1 when overall brightness and contrast were adjusted to be constant, later ERP (P250 and P400) latencies showed differences as a function of hemisphere. Hence, our data indicate that N170 increases its magnitude when multiple faces are seen, apparently impervious to basic low-level stimulus features including stimulus size. Outstanding questions remain regarding category-sensitive neural activity that is elicited to viewing multiple items of stimulus categories other than faces.

Indexed as

brightnesscontrastERPsfacesmultiple facesN170P100P250

Identifiers

PMID23785327
PMCPMC3682123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.