Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23785271›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Modelling co-infection with malaria and lymphatic filariasis.

Hannah C Slater, Manoj Gambhir, Paul E Parham, Edwin Michael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical features and management of pediatric lymphedema.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mathematical Model for Optimal Control of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Modeling Lyme disease transmission.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Modeling the Parasitic Filariasis Spread by Mosquito in Periodic Environment.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Molecular epidemiology, phylogeny and evolution of the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti.Infection, genetics and evolution : journal of molecular epidemiology and evolutionary genetics in infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah C SlaterDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Manoj Gambhir
Paul E Parham
Edwin Michael

Funding

Modeling lymphatic filariasis transmission and eradication in Papua New GuineaR01AI069387 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI MICHAEL, EDWIN · 2007 to 2011
$773k
NIAID NIH HHS AI069387-01A1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria and lymphatic filariasis (LF) continue to cause a considerable public health burden globally and are co-endemic in many regions of sub-Saharan Africa. These infections are transmitted by the same mosquito species which raises important questions about optimal vector control strategies in co-endemic regions, as well as the effect of the presence of each infection on endemicity of the other; there is currently little consensus on the latter. The need for comprehensive modelling studies to address such questions is therefore significant, yet very few have been undertaken to date despite the recognised explanatory power of reliable dynamic mathematical models. Here, we develop a malaria-LF co-infection modelling framework that accounts for two key interactions between these infections, namely the increase in vector mortality as LF mosquito prevalence increases and the antagonistic Th1/Th2 immune response that occurs in co-infected hosts. We consider the crucial interplay between these interactions on the resulting endemic prevalence when introducing each infection in regions where the other is already endemic (e.g. due to regional environmental change), and the associated timescale for such changes, as well as effects on the basic reproduction number R₀ of each disease. We also highlight potential perverse effects of vector controls on human infection prevalence in co-endemic regions, noting that understanding such effects is critical in designing optimal integrated control programmes. Hence, as well as highlighting where better data are required to more reliably address such questions, we provide an important framework that will form the basis of future scenario analysis tools used to plan and inform policy decisions on intervention measures in different transmission settings.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAnimalsCulicidaeElephantiasis, FilarialHumansInsect VectorsMalaria

Identifiers

PMID23785271
PMCPMC3681634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.