Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23785114›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of epidemiology2013

Quantitative association of tobacco smoking with the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis of studies conducted between 1979 and 2011.

Wen-Qiong Xue, Hai-De Qin, Hong-Lian Ruan, Yin Yao Shugart, Wei-Hua Jia

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Passive smoking and risk of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Guangdong Biobank Cohort (GDBC) study.European journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The burden and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Sweden.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025
    Article
  12. Analysis and projection of the disease burden of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China based on the GBD database.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Systematic Review on Clinico-Aetiopathological Trends of Nasopharyngeal Cancer in Asia.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Qiong XueState Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, People’s Republic of China.
Hai-De Qin
Hong-Lian Ruan
Yin Yao Shugart
Wei-Hua Jia
National Institutes of Health · USState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China

Funding

Developing new statisical methods to detect variants involved in complex diseaseZIAMH002929 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI YAO, YIN · 2011 to 2016
$2.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, many studies have attempted to establish a link between tobacco smoking and an increased risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but their results have been inconsistent. To clarify this link, we first conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to integrate the findings of epidemiologic studies from the last half-century. The methodology used for this study followed the checklist proposed by the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. Pooled risk estimates were generated using a random-effects model. Twenty-eight case-control studies and 4 cohort studies involving a total of 10,274 NPC cases and 415,266 comparison subjects were included. A substantial effect of smoking on the risk of NPC was identified in this study. The results showed that ever smokers had a 60% greater risk of developing the disease than never smokers (95% confidence interval: 1.38, 1.87); this was a robust dose-dependent association. More importantly, stronger associations were observed in low-risk populations and among persons with the predominant histological type of differentiated NPC than in high-risk populations and persons with an undifferentiated type; the odds ratios were 1.76 and 2.20, respectively, versus 1.29 and 1.27. In this comprehensive meta-analysis, well-established statistical evidence was provided about the role of tobacco smoking in the etiology of NPC.

Indexed as

CarcinomaCase-Control StudiesCausalityCohort StudiesComorbidityConfidence IntervalsEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsOdds RatioRisk FactorsSmokingcase-control studiescohort studiesmeta-analysisnasopharyngeal carcinomaodds ratiotobacco smoking

Identifiers

PMID23785114
PMCPMC3727336
OpenAlexW2126072615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.