Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23785064›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2013

Stereoselective inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 by fluoxetine and its metabolite: implications for risk assessment of multiple time-dependent inhibitor systems.

Justin D Lutz, Brooke M VandenBrink, Katipudi N Babu, Wendel L Nelson, Kent L Kunze, Nina Isoherranen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role of metabolites in drug-drug interactions.Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin D LutzDepartment of Pharmaceutics (J.D.L., N.I.) and Department of Medicinal Chemistry (B.M.V., K.N.B., W.L.N., K.L.K.), School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Brooke M VandenBrink
Katipudi N Babu
Wendel L Nelson
Kent L Kunze
Nina Isoherranen
University of Washington · US

Funding

TOXIC DRUG INTERACTIONS WITH VALPROIC ACIDP01GM032165 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RETTIE, ALLAN EDWARD · 1985 to 2012
$18.3M
Pharmacological Sciences SupplementT32GM007750 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ATKINS, WILLIAM M · 1985 to 2023
$12.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM032165NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM32165NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent guidance on drug-drug interaction (DDI) testing recommends evaluation of circulating metabolites. However, there is little consensus on how to quantitatively predict and/or assess the risk of in vivo DDIs by multiple time-dependent inhibitors (TDIs) including metabolites from in vitro data. Fluoxetine was chosen as the model drug to evaluate the role of TDI metabolites in DDI prediction because it is a TDI of both CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 with a circulating N-dealkylated inhibitory metabolite, norfluoxetine. In pooled human liver microsomes, both enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were TDIs of CYP2C19, (S)-norfluoxetine was the most potent inhibitor with time-dependent inhibition affinity constant (KI) of 7 μM, and apparent maximum time-dependent inhibition rate (k(inact,app)) of 0.059 min(-1). Only (S)-fluoxetine and (R)-norfluoxetine were TDIs of CYP3A4, with (R)-norfluoxetine being the most potent (K(I) = 8 μM, and k(inact,app) = 0.011 min(-1)). Based on in-vitro-to-in-vivo predictions, (S)-norfluoxetine plays the most important role in in vivo CYP2C19 DDIs, whereas (R)-norfluoxetine is most important in CYP3A4 DDIs. Comparison of two multiple TDI prediction models demonstrated significant differences between them in in-vitro-to-in-vitro predictions but not in in-vitro-to-in-vivo predictions. Inclusion of all four inhibitors predicted an in vivo decrease in CYP2C19 (95%) and CYP3A4 (60-62%) activity. The results of this study suggest that adequate worst-case risk assessment for in vivo DDIs by multiple TDI systems can be achieved by incorporating time-dependent inhibition by both parent and metabolite via simple addition of the in vivo time-dependent inhibition rate/cytochrome P450 degradation rate constant (λ/k(deg)) values, but quantitative DDI predictions will require a more thorough understanding of TDI mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug InteractionsFluoxetineHumansMicrosomes, LiverRisk AssessmentStereoisomerismAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesCYP2C19 protein, humanCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 CYP3A InhibitorsCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemFluoxetinenorfluoxetine

Identifiers

PMID23785064
PMCPMC3834134
OpenAlexW2113533305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.