Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23784813›Full record

ArticleBiopolymers2013

Twenty-five years of nucleic acid simulations.

Thomas E Cheatham, David A Case

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopolymers, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Thermodynamic Swings: How Ideal Complex of Cas9-RNA/DNA Forms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas E CheathamDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, 2000 East 30 South Skaggs 105, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112.
David A Case

Funding

The Center for HIV RNA Studies (CRNA)P50GM103297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAYIE, KWAKU · 2012 to 2016
$21.7M
INTERACTIONS IN NONNATIVE STATES OF PROTEINSR01GM057513 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CASE, DAVID A · 1998 to 2012
$3.3M
Biomolecular simulation for the end-stage refinement of nucleic acid structureR01GM081411 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CHEATHAM, THOMAS E. · 2008 to 2022
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM103297NIGMS NIH HHS GM57513NIGMS NIH HHS GM81411NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM103297NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a brief, and largely personal, history of computer simulations of DNA and RNA oligonucleotides, with an emphasis on duplex structures and the Amber force fields. Both explicit and implicit solvent models are described, and methods for estimating structures, thermodynamics and mechanical properties of duplexes are illustrated. This overview, covering about two decades of work, provides a perspective for a discussion of prospects and obstacles for future simulations of RNA and DNA.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationRNAComputer SimulationDNAOligonucleotidesThermodynamicsDNAOligonucleotidesRNAforce fieldsmolecular dynamicsnucleic acids

Identifiers

PMID23784813
PMCPMC3820278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.