Trial reportClinical drug investigation2013
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single and repeat inhaled doses of umeclidinium in healthy subjects: two randomized studies.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00475436 (A Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ascending, 3-cohort Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of GSK573719 Administered as Singledoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-centre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ascending, 3-cohort Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of GSK573719 Administered as Singledoses (750 μg and 1000 μg) and Repeat Doses Over 14 Days (250 μg-1000 μg Once-daily) of GSK573719 in Healthy Male and Female Subjects.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Umeclidinium bromide versus placebo for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Population Pharmacokinetics Modeling of Inhaled Umeclidinium for Adult Patients with Asthma.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2017Trial
- Dose response of umeclidinium administered once or twice daily in patients with COPD: a randomised cross-over study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2014Trial
- Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Treat and Severe Asthma: A Narrative Review Focusing on Inflammation from Bench to Bedside.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Pharmacokinetics, metabolite profiling, safety, and tolerability of inhalation aerosol of 101BHG-D01, a novel, long-acting and selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, in healthy Chinese subjects.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- The ELLIPTA® Dry Powder Inhaler: Design, Functionality, In Vitro Dosing Performance and Critical Task Compliance by Patients and Caregivers.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2015Article
- Patient considerations in the treatment of COPD: focus on the new combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Review
- Effect of severe renal impairment on umeclidinium and umeclidinium/vilanterol pharmacokinetics and safety: a single-blind, nonrandomized study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Article
- Umeclidinium bromide and vilanterol trifenatate inhalation powder.Hospital pharmacy · 2014Article
- New developments in the combination treatment of COPD: focus on umeclidinium/vilanterol.Drug design, development and therapy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has a significant negative impact on quality of life and increases the risk of premature death. Umeclidinium is a long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of COPD with the aim to broaden treatment options for clinicians and patients by providing improved symptom control.
objectiveTo characterize the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single and repeat inhaled doses of umeclidinium in healthy subjects. STUDY
designTwo randomized, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose studies were conducted in healthy ipratropium bromide-responsive subjects. In the single-dose study, subjects (n = 20) received umeclidinium (10-350 μg), tiotropium bromide 18 μg and placebo in a crossover dosing schedule. In this study, lung function was assessed for 24 h by measuring specific airways conductance (sGaw) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). In the repeat-dose study, subjects (n = 36) received umeclidinium (250-1,000 μg) and placebo for 14 days in a parallel-group schedule.
resultsAdverse events (AEs) were reported in five subjects (single-dose study) and 23 subjects (repeat-dose study); none were serious. In both studies, no abnormalities in 12-lead electrocardiogram parameters, 24-h Holter monitoring or lead II monitoring were reported as AEs. Umeclidinium was rapidly absorbed following single-dose administration [time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (tmax) 5-15 min] and repeat-dose administration (tmax 5-7 min). Following repeat dosing, the geometric mean plasma elimination half-life was approximately 27 h and statistically significant accumulation was observed for the area under the plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration and cumulative amount of unchanged drug excreted into the urine at 24 h (range 1.5- to 4.5-fold). Umeclidinium at doses of 100 μg and above, and tiotropium bromide demonstrated statistically significant bronchodilatory effects relative to placebo at 12 h post-dosing, which lasted up to 24 h for umeclidinium 350 μg and for tiotropium bromide. Relative to placebo, these increases in sGaw were 24-34 % at 12 h post-dose and 13 % at 24 h post-dose. Increases in FEV1 achieved statistical significance at 12 and 24 h for umeclidinium 100 μg and 350 μg compared with placebo.
conclusionUmeclidinium was well tolerated and demonstrated bronchodilatory effects in healthy subjects for up to 24 h. These bronchodilatory effects can be potentially clinically important in patients with airway obstruction such as COPD. The data obtained have informed dose selection for subsequent trials in subjects with COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23784369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.