Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23784346›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013

Sex related differences on valproic acid pharmacokinetics after oral single dose.

Manuel Ibarra, Marta Vázquez, Pietro Fagiolino, Hartmut Derendorf

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of population pharmacokinetics of valproic acid.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation ofPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuel IbarraPharmaceutical Sciences Department, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de la República, P.O. Box 1157, 11800, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Marta Vázquez
Pietro Fagiolino
Hartmut Derendorf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasma concentration-time data obtained after an oral single dose of 500-mg valproic acid (VPA) in a delayed release formulation was used to model enterohepatic cycling of the drug. Fourteen healthy subjects (seven women and seven men) were enrolled, food intake was standardized, blood samples were withdrawn up to 48 h post dosing and VPA plasma concentrations were analyzed by HPLC-UV method. Secondary peaks of VPA were observed in almost all subjects. A population pharmacokinetic analysis with sex, weight, age and contraceptive therapy as possible covariates was performed. Women without contraceptive therapy presented a longer lag time, a lower VPA hepatic output and a higher reabsorbed fraction than men. Weight affected both volume of the central compartment and the absorption rate constant. Women under contraceptive therapy showed similar disposition parameters to men. Reabsorbed fraction of bioavailable dose was 46.2 % in women and 21.8 % in men, revealing important sex differences in drug hepatobiliar output. These results showed that VPA displays sex-related pharmacokinetic differences due to different metabolic and transporter-mediated disposition.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAdministration, OralAdultCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsValproic AcidYoung AdultValproic Acid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.