Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23784128›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Challenges for standardization of Clostridium difficile typing methods.

Charlotte A Huber, Niki F Foster, Thomas V Riley, David L Paterson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Strain and the Clinical Outcome ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Application of a core genome sequence typing (cgMLST) pipeline for surveillance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Systems biology approach to functionally assess theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Ribotype Classification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Identification and Characterization ofBioMed research international · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. A Primer on Infectious Disease Bacterial Genomics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte A HuberThe University of Queensland, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Campus, Brisbane, Australia.
Niki F Foster
Thomas V Riley
David L Paterson
University of Western Australia · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typing of Clostridium difficile facilitates understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Some evaluations have shown that certain strain types (for example, ribotype 027) are more virulent than others and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Although restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis have been widely used in the past, PCR ribotyping is the current method of choice for typing of C. difficile. However, global standardization of ribotyping results is urgently needed. Whole-genome sequencing of C. difficile has the potential to provide even greater epidemiologic information than ribotyping.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsHumansMolecular EpidemiologyProhibitinsRibotypingProhibitins

Identifiers

PMID23784128
PMCPMC3754675
OpenAlexW1983174598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.