ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
Effects of aggregate and individual antibiotic exposure on vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from pediatric patients.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Ivermectin-Derived Compound D4 and Its Antimicrobial/Biofilm Properties against MRSA.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Balancing vancomycin efficacy and nephrotoxicity: should we be aiming for trough or AUC/MIC?Paediatric drugs · 2015Article
- Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Children With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the evolution of vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus and their relationship with vancomycin use among hospitalized children. S. aureus isolates recovered from sterile sites were prospectively tested for vancomycin susceptibility using the Etest between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2008. Vancomycin MICs were grouped into three categories: ≤ 1, 1.5, and 2 μg/ml. The association between vancomycin MICs and aggregate vancomycin use and individual patient vancomycin exposure 6 months prior to the documented infection was assessed. The geometric mean values for vancomycin MICs for S. aureus fluctuated over time without a significant trend (P = 0.146). Of the 436 patients included in the study, 363 (83%) had methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 73 (17%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections. The rate of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/ml increased from 4% (2 of 46) in 2000 to 2001 to 24% (11 of 46) in 2007 to 2008, despite a decrease in vancomycin use (r = -0.11; P = 0.825). The percentage of isolates with a vancomycin MIC of 2 μg/ml was higher for MRSA (15%; 11 of 73) than for MSSA strains (5.2%; 19 of 363) (χ(2) = 9.2; P = 0.01). Individual patient vancomycin exposure was not associated with a higher vancomycin MIC. In the unadjusted model, in which we compared patients with S. aureus infections with MICs of ≤ 1 μg/ml, the odds ratios of exposure rates for patients with isolates with MICs of 1.5 μg/ml and 2 μg/ml were 1.02 (P = 0.929) and 1.13 (P = 0.767), respectively. In our experience, the geometric means of vancomycin MICs from S. aureus isolates recovered from hospitalized children oscillated over time and were not associated with previous individual patient vancomycin exposure or aggregate vancomycin use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.