Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23783631›Full record

ArticleNature2013

Modulation of allostery by protein intrinsic disorder.

Allan Chris M Ferreon, Josephine C Ferreon, Peter E Wright, Ashok A Deniz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phosphorylation enables allosteric control of a viral condensate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Folding-upon-binding pathways of an intrinsically disordered protein from a deep Markov state model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Structural biases in disordered proteins are prevalent in the cell.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Vital for Viruses: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.Journal of molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allan Chris M FerreonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Josephine C Ferreon
Peter E Wright
Ashok A Deniz

Funding

Structural basis for CBP/p300 transcriptional regulationR01CA096865 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2002 to 2016
$6.2M
Single Molecule Studies of Protein Folding MechanismsR01GM066833 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DENIZ, ASHOK A · 2003 to 2017
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA96865NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096865NIGMS NIH HHS GM066833NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allostery is an intrinsic property of many globular proteins and enzymes that is indispensable for cellular regulatory and feedback mechanisms. Recent theoretical and empirical observations indicate that allostery is also manifest in intrinsically disordered proteins, which account for a substantial proportion of the proteome. Many intrinsically disordered proteins are promiscuous binders that interact with multiple partners and frequently function as molecular hubs in protein interaction networks. The adenovirus early region 1A (E1A) oncoprotein is a prime example of a molecular hub intrinsically disordered protein. E1A can induce marked epigenetic reprogramming of the cell within hours after infection, through interactions with a diverse set of partners that include key host regulators such as the general transcriptional coactivator CREB binding protein (CBP), its paralogue p300, and the retinoblastoma protein (pRb; also called RB1). Little is known about the allosteric effects at play in E1A-CBP-pRb interactions, or more generally in hub intrinsically disordered protein interaction networks. Here we used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to study coupled binding and folding processes in the ternary E1A system. The low concentrations used in these high-sensitivity experiments proved to be essential for these studies, which are challenging owing to a combination of E1A aggregation propensity and high-affinity binding interactions. Our data revealed that E1A-CBP-pRb interactions have either positive or negative cooperativity, depending on the available E1A interaction sites. This striking cooperativity switch enables fine-tuning of the thermodynamic accessibility of the ternary versus binary E1A complexes, and may permit a context-specific tuning of associated downstream signalling outputs. Such a modulation of allosteric interactions is probably a common mechanism in molecular hub intrinsically disordered protein function.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAdenovirus E1A ProteinsAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsAnisotropyCREB-Binding ProteinFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansMiceModels, Molecularp300-CBP Transcription FactorsProtein BindingProtein FoldingProtein Structure, TertiaryRetinoblastoma ProteinThermodynamicsAdenovirus E1A ProteinsCREB-Binding Proteinp300-CBP Transcription FactorsRetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID23783631
PMCPMC3718496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.