Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23783562›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2013

A comparison of effects of broad-spectrum antibiotics and biosurfactants on established bacterial biofilms.

Gerry A Quinn, Aaron P Maloy, Malik M Banat, Ibrahim M Banat

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sepsis: mechanisms of bacterial injury to the patient.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Killing of Serratia marcescens biofilms with chloramphenicol.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Anti-biofilm Activity as a Health Issue.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerry A QuinnCentre of Applied Marine Biotechnology (CAMBio), Letterkenny Institute of Technology (LYIT), Port Road, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland, gerryquinn@gmail.com.
Aaron P Maloy
Malik M Banat
Ibrahim M Banat
Letterkenny Institute of Technology · IERoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current antibiofilm solutions based on planktonic bacterial physiology have limited efficacy in clinical and occasionally environmental settings. This has prompted a search for suitable alternatives to conventional therapies. This study compares the inhibitory properties of two biological surfactants (rhamnolipids and a plant-derived surfactant) against a selection of broad-spectrum antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol and kanamycin). Testing was carried out on a range of bacterial physiologies from planktonic and mixed bacterial biofilms. Rhamnolipids (Rhs) have been extensively characterised for their role in the development of biofilms and inhibition of planktonic bacteria. However, there are limited direct comparisons with antimicrobial substances on established biofilms comprising single or mixed bacterial strains. Baseline measurements of inhibitory activity using planktonic bacterial assays established that broad-spectrum antibiotics were 500 times more effective at inhibiting bacterial growth than either Rhs or plant surfactants. Conversely, Rhs and plant biosurfactants reduced biofilm biomass of established single bacterial biofilms by 74-88 and 74-98 %, respectively. Only kanamycin showed activity against biofilms of Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were also ineffective against a complex biofilm of marine bacteria; however, Rhs and plant biosurfactants reduced biofilm biomass by 69 and 42 %, respectively. These data suggest that Rhs and plant-derived surfactants may have an important role in the inhibition of complex biofilms.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBiofilmsDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSurface-Active AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID23783562
OpenAlexW1978824107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.